Cabius
More Disney-obsessed than is healthy.
- Joined
- Nov 22, 2017
- Messages
- 1,574
Not necessarily.The way I read into it...no one has to do the Genie recommendations, but it will be the quickest way to do the rides you want without paying.
A third-party app can genuinely give every user advice on how to optimize the day for the user. A Disney app has to give advice to optimize the day for the park.
TouringPlans can tell the small % of guests that use it how to optimize their day and get the most bang for their buck. The benefit consists entirely of being more informed than the average guest.
There are so many butts in so many seats on any given day at Magic Kingdom. An individual can get their butt in more seats by being more informed and organized than the average guests. But it's not possible for every guest to be above-average, and attempts to universalize differentiated goods entirely miss the point. It would be one thing if ride capacity were truly sitting empty, but that's really not the case.
-- Virtual queues may let people wait in two lines at once, or enjoy shopping/dining/atmosphere while they wait.
-- Limiting guests to one virtual queue in a class of attraction (like how you can't get a FP+ for multiple Tier 1 rides) or to one use per X days would actually reduce demand, which would be an improvement in terms of availability and thus wait times.
-- Paid FP+ may let people buy their way out of lines (but increase wait times for free guests commensurately - it's zero-sum).
-- Charging per ride ticket would actually bend the demand curve and reduce wait times, at the expense of guests (especially APs) not getting to go on as many attractions. No way they'll do this, though.
These are the things that can make a difference. The recommendation engine can't make every guest above-average.