Extra Fastpasses: A Case Study

I understand that perhaps they are offering later times for FPs (and not showing times in the near future) to attempt to keep people in the parks spending money. But I also see that as a huge waste of FP capacity. Because if those close times are not being offered, eventually they just expire and go away.
 
Here's a simple question for people who reject the idea that the steps Disney has taken up to now to implement the FP+ system were part of a general plan to get to this point.

If Disney always intended to completely remove the paper FP system (which seems obvious) and replace it with a system like what is in place today, how could they have accomplished that in a way that wasn't going to cause at least a certain amount of inconvenience for at least some guests?

Putting aside the issue of whether or not you think the new system is an improvement for guests as a whole (not just for you selfishly), I cannot imagine how something of this magnitude could be accomplished without going in small and gradual steps to test its various features.

It sounds good in theory to announce a schedule far enough in advance so that guests who do not want to deal with any inconvenience can decline to schedule a trip. But, with all of the things that can go into scheduling a trip (such as nonrefundable plane reservations), this could require notice more than 6 months in advance. Although it is my opinion that Disney had a detailed step by step plan for implementation, they could not have known that far in advance the exact dates that certain steps would take place because moving to step 2 requires a satisfactory result on step 1, and that continues though step 100.

Plus, explaining to potential guests exactly what the changes were going to be, and what impact they might have on their trips, would be extremely confusing to the vast majority of guests. Some would have no idea what they meant, others would shrug their shoulders and move on, and a very small percentage would think "I'm not going to have the experience I expected so I'm not going to Disney this year".

Personally, I think that Disney knew what it was doing, and also had to know that some guests were likely to be upset. Just like some guests are upset when a favorite attraction is down, or construction walls are up, or a crane is up near the castle, etc., etc. But, some of that inconvenience is inevitable when implementing something of this magnitude into a dynamic operation.
 
I think the truth of the story behind FP+ changes likely lies somewhere in the middle. I don't believe for a second that Disney had no intentions of changing anything until guest feedback started rolling in. I also don't believe that Disney has had set plans from the start and not deviated from them or taken guest feedback into consideration. There are people on both sides of the debate claiming both of these things.

Either way, the way they've handled the rollout is IMO garbage. They have been very quiet about negative changes (like tiers, removal of KTTW cards etc.) while only being open about their positive changes (lock in your favourites, 4th FP is coming). Did I expect them to add the tiers "feature" into their ads? Of course not, but a little openness would have been nice when you're talking about serious impacts on people's vacations, like the unsuspecting Pop Century guests who arrived to find out they were the only guests not allowed to use FP-. I remember the days leading up to that people would call Disney and speak to the "front desk" at Pop, and were being told it was an internet rumour :rolleyes2.

Some of the people who are in the "just wait" camp seem to forget there were real actual people who vacationed with their real money during the last few months where FP+ was arguably at it's worst. Technical issues coupled with the most limiting form of FP+ (with tiers, without the 4th) wasn't exactly a party. Some of us don't get down to Disney multiple times a year, every year, every 2 years, etc. Maybe if Disney had been open about where this was headed, some of us may have been able to schedule our trips away from these few months. We may have tried had we known.

People love to remind others that the Dis members and other hardcore WDW fans are a small number in the parks. That's likely true. Since that's the case, how can you expect people to make themselves aware of something Disney wasn't even talking about?
 
I understand that perhaps they are offering later times for FPs (and not showing times in the near future) to attempt to keep people in the parks spending money. But I also see that as a huge waste of FP capacity. Because if those close times are not being offered, eventually they just expire and go away.

How do you know those "sooner" times are not showing up for guests that are just arriving at the park and either checking an app or the kiosk?
 

I think the truth of the story behind FP+ changes likely lies somewhere in the middle. I don't believe for a second that Disney had no intentions of changing anything until guest feedback started rolling in. I also don't believe that Disney has had set plans from the start and not deviated from them or taken guest feedback into consideration. There are people on both sides of the debate claiming both of these things.

Either way, the way they've handled the rollout is IMO garbage. They have been very quiet about negative changes (like tiers, removal of KTTW cards etc.) while only being open about their positive changes (lock in your favourites, 4th FP is coming). Did I expect them to add the tiers "feature" into their ads? Of course not, but a little openness would have been nice when you're talking about serious impacts on people's vacations, like the unsuspecting Pop Century guests who arrived to find out they were the only guests not allowed to use FP-. I remember the days leading up to that people would call Disney and speak to the "front desk" at Pop, and were being told it was an internet rumour :rolleyes2.

Some of the people who are in the "just wait" camp seem to forget there were real actual people who vacationed with their real money during the last few months where FP+ was arguably at it's worst. Technical issues coupled with the most limiting form of FP+ (with tiers, without the 4th) wasn't exactly a party. Some of us don't get down to Disney multiple times a year, every year, every 2 years, etc. Maybe if Disney had been open about where this was headed, some of us may have been able to schedule our trips away from these few months. We may have tried had we known.

People love to remind others that the Dis members and other hardcore WDW fans are a small number in the parks. That's likely true. Since that's the case, how can you expect people to make themselves aware of something Disney wasn't even talking about?

But with the addition of the 4th FP the tiers don't cause nearly as many issues as they used to. There have been several reports of headliner availability at midday when you would be able to obtain a 4th FP+. Let's say you opted for Tower of Terror, TSM and Star Tours. You use all three and then pull your 4th for RnR. Once you've used your 4th, you can pull a 5th for ToT etc. It solves the "re-ride" and the "can't see all headliners" elements that were the main complaints of the system with 3 FP+ and tiers :confused3
 
I think the truth of the story behind FP+ changes likely lies somewhere in the middle. I don't believe for a second that Disney had no intentions of changing anything until guest feedback started rolling in. I also don't believe that Disney has had set plans from the start and not deviated from them or taken guest feedback into consideration. There are people on both sides of the debate claiming both of these things.

Either way, the way they've handled the rollout is IMO garbage. They have been very quiet about negative changes (like tiers, removal of KTTW cards etc.) while only being open about their positive changes (lock in your favourites, 4th FP is coming). Did I expect them to add the tiers "feature" into their ads? Of course not, but a little openness would have been nice when you're talking about serious impacts on people's vacations, like the unsuspecting Pop Century guests who arrived to find out they were the only guests not allowed to use FP-. I remember the days leading up to that people would call Disney and speak to the "front desk" at Pop, and were being told it was an internet rumour :rolleyes2.

Some of the people who are in the "just wait" camp seem to forget there were real actual people who vacationed with their real money during the last few months where FP+ was arguably at it's worst. Technical issues coupled with the most limiting form of FP+ (with tiers, without the 4th) wasn't exactly a party. Some of us don't get down to Disney multiple times a year, every year, every 2 years, etc. Maybe if Disney had been open about where this was headed, some of us may have been able to schedule our trips away from these few months. We may have tried had we known.

People love to remind others that the Dis members and other hardcore WDW fans are a small number in the parks. That's likely true. Since that's the case, how can you expect people to make themselves aware of something Disney wasn't even talking about?

:thumbsup2

That covers it nicely. It's easy to find out about ride closures before a trip. That was not the case with how they handled this FP+ rollout.
 
How do you know those "sooner" times are not showing up for guests that are just arriving at the park and either checking an app or the kiosk?

We don't know. But we do know the fewer times they are offered, the fewer times they are being booked and used. And every slot not booked is a slot that is just wasted.

How do you know those earlier times aren't being booked, then rescheduled for later? My point is that to make the best use of the system, they should encourage guests to take the earlier times so that later times will still be available.
 
People realize the $1.5 billion spend wasn't just on FP+ right? :rolleyes2

You are wasting your breath with something this factual on this board. Be prepared for the responses that you are just drinking the Disney Kool Aid

There are a lot of people on this board who apparently think this money was all spent on FP+. Even some of those who seem intelligent enough to know better can't resist making countless jokes about how Disney spent billions of dollars just to get rid of slips of paper.

I think the same people who don't appreciate this reality also don't understand the complexity of putting something of this magnitude into effect in a theme park environment. It isn't the kind of system that you can run in parallel until it is thoroughly tested and debugged before being released to the public.
 
Here's a simple question for people who reject the idea that the steps Disney has taken up to now to implement the FP+ system were part of a general plan to get to this point.

If Disney always intended to completely remove the paper FP system (which seems obvious) and replace it with a system like what is in place today, how could they have accomplished that in a way that wasn't going to cause at least a certain amount of inconvenience for at least some guests?

Putting aside the issue of whether or not you think the new system is an improvement for guests as a whole (not just for you selfishly), I cannot imagine how something of this magnitude could be accomplished without going in small and gradual steps to test its various features.

It sounds good in theory to announce a schedule far enough in advance so that guests who do not want to deal with any inconvenience can decline to schedule a trip. But, with all of the things that can go into scheduling a trip (such as nonrefundable plane reservations), this could require notice more than 6 months in advance. Although it is my opinion that Disney had a detailed step by step plan for implementation, they could not have known that far in advance the exact dates that certain steps would take place because moving to step 2 requires a satisfactory result on step 1, and that continues though step 100.

Plus, explaining to potential guests exactly what the changes were going to be, and what impact they might have on their trips, would be extremely confusing to the vast majority of guests. Some would have no idea what they meant, others would shrug their shoulders and move on, and a very small percentage would think "I'm not going to have the experience I expected so I'm not going to Disney this year".

Personally, I think that Disney knew what it was doing, and also had to know that some guests were likely to be upset. Just like some guests are upset when a favorite attraction is down, or construction walls are up, or a crane is up near the castle, etc., etc. But, some of that inconvenience is inevitable when implementing something of this magnitude into a dynamic operation.

I think a few small gestures could have gone a long way. In general, more openness would have been nice to see. For example:

Informing front of the line CM's (like the call centre ones) of the general direction of where this is headed as well as major steps that are happening at that moment, like the Pop situation, so guests who call aren't getting 5 different answers none being correct.

Being more open about the direction of FP+ would have been nice too. For those of us who went after FP- left but before the 4th FP+ was released and were unhappy with FP+, waiting and seeing doesn't really change our experiences. Knowing that the 4th and hopping were coming and approximately when (which they almost certainly did) may have allowed some of us to change our vacation plans. Why could they not have conservatively said something like summer 2014?

I know we were choosing between last February and the coming September. We go maybe every 2-3 years. Knowing what was coming may have pushed us towards September.
 
Here's hoping that this kind of situation can become the norm.

I'd again like to thank so many who so often COMPLAINED about the woefully
inadequate and severely limited "all new" FP+ system as it was first introduced.

Without these complaints (here, on other boards, and directly to Disney) the folks at Disney
would not have known that their system was so disappointing
to those who had used the original in-park FP system so successfully in the past.

My hope is also that those who are finding the GLITCHES
in the "fabulous" new MyMagicPlus/DME systems so frustrating
will continue to let Disney know
that you are very disappointed with the product they have forced onto their
loyal paying customers.

The squeaky wheel gets the grease.


Very true statement

The squeaky wheel gets the grease.[/QUOTE]

I was very aware of this statement a few years ago. Which is why I kept the FP abuse issue alive as much as I could.
 
I think a few small gestures could have gone a long way. In general, more openness would have been nice to see. For example:

Informing front of the line CM's (like the call centre ones) of the general direction of where this is headed as well as major steps that are happening at that moment, like the Pop situation, so guests who call aren't getting 5 different answers none being correct.

Being more open about the direction of FP+ would have been nice too. For those of us who went after FP- left but before the 4th FP+ was released and were unhappy with FP+, waiting and seeing doesn't really change our experiences. Knowing that the 4th and hopping were coming and approximately when (which they almost certainly did) may have allowed some of us to change our vacation plans. Why could they not have conservatively said something like summer 2014?

I know we were choosing between last February and the coming September. We go maybe every 2-3 years. Knowing what was coming may have pushed us towards September.



But if they were up front with where this was going, people might have waited to book their trips until it got there.
 
Well, either that or all the people at Disney are clueless and evil and they hired engineers who do not know how to design systems. These people are now all being "fixed" by internet message board posters. :rotfl:

It seems that there are a number of posters who honestly believe this.
 
I understand that perhaps they are offering later times for FPs (and not showing times in the near future) to attempt to keep people in the parks spending money. But I also see that as a huge waste of FP capacity. Because if those close times are not being offered, eventually they just expire and go away.

One possibility could be that those earlier times are for those just getting to the Park and/or meant for a specific "spread of FP's" based on selection criteria when folks reserve 3 together.

It's no fun not to know why, that's for sure. The good news is, we don't seem to be completely locked out of them. Hopefully, we can continue to finagle them to better times once the FP is released to us. The more reports back from people trying and having success we get will help a lot.
 
But with the addition of the 4th FP the tiers don't cause nearly as many issues as they used to. There have been several reports of headliner availability at midday when you would be able to obtain a 4th FP+. Let's say you opted for Tower of Terror, TSM and Star Tours. You use all three and then pull your 4th for RnR. Once you've used your 4th, you can pull a 5th for ToT etc. It solves the "re-ride" and the "can't see all headliners" elements that were the main complaints of the system with 3 FP+ and tiers :confused3

That's all well and good, but that did not apply to those of us who vacationed January-March, which was my entire point. Some of us got the shorter end of the stick, and Disney was very tight lipped about those aspects of FP+.

I bet people who were unhappy that they didn't receive KTTW cards at Pop near the beginning don't feel better that now everyone doesn't have them. Their trip was still impacted, even if it wasn't a permanent situation. What you've mentioned is nice for our upcoming trips whenever they may be, but had absolutely no effect on our February one.

You seem to be leaving out that tiers were in effect about 5 (?) months or so before the 4th FP came into effect. Again, the fix has no impact on those of us who didn't travel in the last month or so.
 
You are wasting your breath with something this factual on this board. Be prepared for the responses that you are just drinking the Disney Kool Aid

There are a lot of people on this board who apparently think this money was all spent on FP+. Even some of those who seem intelligent enough to know better can't resist making countless jokes about how Disney spent billions of dollars just to get rid of slips of paper.

I think the same people who don't appreciate this reality also don't understand the complexity of putting something of this magnitude into effect in a theme park environment. It isn't the kind of system that you can run in parallel until it is thoroughly tested and debugged before being released to the public.

Oh I know that people will come back and say that $1.5 billion would be better spent on an entirely new land or an extension of the monorail...rather than "getting rid of slips of paper" :rolleyes: because apparently Disney also operates in a "magical" environment where they don't function as a normal business whose primary objective is to make money :teacher:

There was no other way to implement this system. In September I had a great conversation with a MyMagic+ Project Manager. He gave me some great insight into the planning and implementation and was genuinely interested in my feedback. My experience wasn't 100% positive at first either!

If they had continued to run legacy FP all the way up to FP+ launch they would have had skewed data AND monumentally messed up FP return queues! At the end of the day, they took an antiquated system (paper slips) that was clearly not functioning as they had originally hoped (No, they didn't intend for less than 50% of their guests to use it and for people to be able to get 12 fastpasses per day) and was severely underutilized by their guests, revolutionized it, allowed for BOTH advance booking and spontaneous change, increased the number of users thereby benefitting more guests....AND that is only the FP+ portion of this complex system!
 
I think the truth of the story behind FP+ changes likely lies somewhere in the middle. I don't believe for a second that Disney had no intentions of changing anything until guest feedback started rolling in. I also don't believe that Disney has had set plans from the start and not deviated from them or taken guest feedback into consideration. There are people on both sides of the debate claiming both of these things.

Either way, the way they've handled the rollout is IMO garbage. They have been very quiet about negative changes (like tiers, removal of KTTW cards etc.) while only being open about their positive changes (lock in your favourites, 4th FP is coming). Did I expect them to add the tiers "feature" into their ads? Of course not, but a little openness would have been nice when you're talking about serious impacts on people's vacations, like the unsuspecting Pop Century guests who arrived to find out they were the only guests not allowed to use FP-. I remember the days leading up to that people would call Disney and speak to the "front desk" at Pop, and were being told it was an internet rumour :rolleyes2.

Some of the people who are in the "just wait" camp seem to forget there were real actual people who vacationed with their real money during the last few months where FP+ was arguably at it's worst. Technical issues coupled with the most limiting form of FP+ (with tiers, without the 4th) wasn't exactly a party. Some of us don't get down to Disney multiple times a year, every year, every 2 years, etc. Maybe if Disney had been open about where this was headed, some of us may have been able to schedule our trips away from these few months. We may have tried had we known.

People love to remind others that the Dis members and other hardcore WDW fans are a small number in the parks. That's likely true. Since that's the case, how can you expect people to make themselves aware of something Disney wasn't even talking about?

:thumbsup2 I totally agree, with everything you said. I think the truth behind the changes is somewhere in the middle, but the lack of info has been frustrating. I had a perfectly nice day at MK during those months, but I kept my expectations low. I feel for those who made very expensive once-in-a-lifetime trips, tried to research and plan, and ended up disappointed by changes or dealing with glitches.
 
But if they were up front with where this was going, people might have waited to book their trips until it got there.

Which is likely why they didn't say anything, and I don't understand why some people can't see why some of us take issue with that.

Our trips paid for with our money were being impacted, we weren't gifted them by Disney to be test subjects, we weren't offered discounts to be test subjects. Only the small minority of internet Disney fans were aware of some of the changes, and nobody except the people who supposedly had insider info knew when and what was coming.
 
But if they were up front with where this was going, people might have waited to book their trips until it got there.

Can't you see from a business perspective that this is EXACTLY why they didn't tell people there might be issues? I get that it wasn't "fair" to guests that vacationed between Jan and Mar but they weren't going to say "oh and by the way, in April we will be fully implementing this system, so why don't you just hold off until then?" :scratchin

At the end of the day, their primary objective is to make money.
 
I think the truth of the story behind FP+ changes likely lies somewhere in the middle. I don't believe for a second that Disney had no intentions of changing anything until guest feedback started rolling in. I also don't believe that Disney has had set plans from the start and not deviated from them or taken guest feedback into consideration. There are people on both sides of the debate claiming both of these things.

Either way, the way they've handled the rollout is IMO garbage. They have been very quiet about negative changes (like tiers, removal of KTTW cards etc.) while only being open about their positive changes (lock in your favourites, 4th FP is coming). Did I expect them to add the tiers "feature" into their ads? Of course not, but a little openness would have been nice when you're talking about serious impacts on people's vacations, like the unsuspecting Pop Century guests who arrived to find out they were the only guests not allowed to use FP-. I remember the days leading up to that people would call Disney and speak to the "front desk" at Pop, and were being told it was an internet rumour :rolleyes2.

Some of the people who are in the "just wait" camp seem to forget there were real actual people who vacationed with their real money during the last few months where FP+ was arguably at it's worst. Technical issues coupled with the most limiting form of FP+ (with tiers, without the 4th) wasn't exactly a party. Some of us don't get down to Disney multiple times a year, every year, every 2 years, etc. Maybe if Disney had been open about where this was headed, some of us may have been able to schedule our trips away from these few months. We may have tried had we known.

People love to remind others that the Dis members and other hardcore WDW fans are a small number in the parks. That's likely true. Since that's the case, how can you expect people to make themselves aware of something Disney wasn't even talking about?

I have not seen anyone argue that Disney had a plan and that they haven't deviated from. The closest thing to it is what I and others have been saying: The plan for additional FPs was always there - how they would be distributed was to be decided after actual use data and guest reaction/input was received and analyzed.

Disney's communication on this matter, to the extent there was any, was atrocious. Do I have a better way to implement, inform and get a representative sample? Probably not.

Withholding information hurt real people with real plans, but it probably hurt less people in the long run.
 
Can't you see from a business perspective that this is EXACTLY why they didn't tell people there might be issues? I get that it wasn't "fair" to guests that vacationed between Jan and Mar but they weren't going to say "oh and by the way, in April we will be fully implementing this system, so why don't you just hold off until then?" :scratchin

At the end of the day, their primary objective is to make money.

From a business perspective I understand it.

From my perspective, the way the rollout was handled sucked, and I can't understand why other guests refuse to recognize that people were impacted by the rollout even if the situation doesn't exist anymore. Waiting and seeing didn't help those of us who vacationed during the most limiting time.

But from a business perspective, couldn't you say that ride opening dates (like Spring 2014 for 7DMT) also should be kept hush hush, because people may hold of their trips until it opens? I think that probably has more of a chance of delaying a trip than a 4th FP.
 


Disney Vacation Planning. Free. Done for You.
Our Authorized Disney Vacation Planners are here to provide personalized, expert advice, answer every question, and uncover the best discounts. Let Dreams Unlimited Travel take care of all the details, so you can sit back, relax, and enjoy a stress-free vacation.
Vacation Request Forms
Disney EarMarked Producer






DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest DIS Tiktok DIS Twitter

Back
Top Bottom