scottb8888
DVC: SSR, HHI & BVI
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2002
- Messages
- 609
Anyone know of a was to "trade" points permanently from one resort to another without going resale. We would like to get rid of points in one resort and increase points in another?
If you really want a different home resort, you would have to sell your current one and purchase the desired one.Anyone know of a was to "trade" points permanently from one resort to another without going resale.
No way to change home resorts without selling the one you don't want and purchasing the one you do want.THat's not what I mean... for instance I would like to exchange all my ownership in SSR for ownership in BWV.
Not thru Disney. It would have to involve some sort of transaction between you and someone else.THat's not what I mean... for instance I would like to exchange all my ownership in SSR for ownership in BWV.
Some timeshare do this for a fee, usually a large one, but not DVC. Unless you just had someone who wanted to do the same thing, it's usually best just to sell and buy but you're paying extra to do so in terms of a 10% commission plus the closing and any extras along the way like dues. On a 200 point contract you'd lose about $3K not counting the price differences between the 2. Sometimes just doing an add on at the other resort is the best option. Even when you find someone, often one party is more attached to what they own than the other $$$ wise. Basically one tries to take advantage of the other. I've done this with a non DVC timeshare for a DVC contract and had several other discussions of possible permanent trades. It's not worth the aggravation for minimal savings unless it just falls into your lap otherwise.Anyone know of a was to "trade" points permanently from one resort to another without going resale. We would like to get rid of points in one resort and increase points in another?
Wouldn't that be considered fraud? It's the intent, not the mechanism, that matters.I'm not an expert on retitling property... But couldn't you add a person to your title? If someone got a new girlfriend and wanted to add her to his property, that's legit. Once she's added, you can eventually take yourself off. It would take time -- and two title changes per contract which would kill the value in doing this with fees... but isn't it theoretically possible to trade in such a way that Disney cannot ROFR?
Heck you could get married. Then split up. Divide the property amicably however you like.
Just thinking outside the box.
I would just sell your contract and buy the one you want.
Sell SSR and buy BWV. The only way to sell is through a broker (i.e. The "resale" market). You can buy BWV from Disney, but it would cost you ~$70/point extra.THat's not what I mean... for instance I would like to exchange all my ownership in SSR for ownership in BWV.
Perhaps, I don't know. Which part? Titling a friend onto your contract? Or titling yourself off? If you aren't avoiding taxes because there's no capital gain... is it fraud? I could see if this was done to avoid taxes, yeah. But people get married and/or separated all the time to optimize how tax laws affect them or claim residency in cheaper states. There are also gifting options. As long as you aren't exceeding your yearly tax-free gift limits...Wouldn't that be considered fraud? It's the intent, not the mechanism, that matters.
Perhaps, I don't know. Which part? Titling a friend onto your contract? Or titling yourself off? If you aren't avoiding taxes because there's no capital gain... is it fraud? I could see if this was done to avoid taxes, maybe. But people get married and/or separated all the time to optimize how tax laws affect them or claim residency in cheaper states. There are also gifting options. As long as you aren't exceeding your yearly tax-free gift limits...
Intentionally changing the title in such a way specifically to avoid the contractual obligation of ROFR. Since we're talking about real estate, I imagine this could carry criminal, as well as civil, penalties.but isn't it theoretically possible to trade in such a way that Disney cannot ROFR?
Right, but aren't there ways to do this legally? People gift things in such a way as to specifically avoid tax liability all the time. That is not a crime, as long as you stay w/in the rules. Can you think of unconventional ways to exchange property that are not illegal?This part:
Intentionally changing the title in such a way specifically to avoid the contractual obligation of ROFR. Since we're talking about real estate, I imagine this could carry criminal, as well as civil, penalties.
You're building a straw-man now. Of course there are ways to exchange property legally. And there are ways to transfer probably in ways not subject to ROFR when it's a true gift (although you still need the ROFR waiver in order to file the transferred deed).Right, but aren't there ways to do this legally? People gift things in such a way as to specifically avoid tax liability all the time. That is not a crime, as long as you stay w/in the rules. Can you think of unconventional ways to exchange property that are not illegal?
And there are ways to transfer probably in ways not subject to ROFR when it's a true gift. But when you sell or trade a DVC contract, it is subject to ROFR. And your recommendation was to transfer property, why receiving compensation, but avoiding ROFR. That's why you get crosswise with Disney and, potentially, the law.
No there isn't other than if it's a true gift. DVC will treat each as independent transactions AND they will force you to put a value on each before they will give a waiver. As I stated, I've actually done this non DVC to DVC. But to change the title with the intent of bypassing this issue would be fraud as would doing so without a disclosed contract if there were an exchange of funds. If one simply wants to give it to another then no it might not be fraud if done correctly.Right, but aren't there ways to do this legally? People gift things in such a way as to specifically avoid tax liability all the time. That is not a crime, as long as you stay w/in the rules. Can you think of unconventional ways to exchange property that are not illegal?
If there is consideration, then it has to go through ROFR and Disney can take it. Period. Getting "creative" doesn't make it legal.You each own points that you consider equal in value, say 100 BCV and 100 BWV. Do you think a person with good knowledge of property law could find a way to get those exchanged, if both were interested in doing so, without breaking any laws? I would think a creative person could find a way.
THat's not what I mean... for instance I would like to exchange all my ownership in SSR for ownership in BWV.