Escape from Mayo Clinic

Shanti

Momketeer
Joined
Nov 29, 2015
Messages
9,102
Did anyone else read this CNN feature article about an 18 year-old whose parents disagreed with a senior doctor at the Mayo Clinic, so the hospital tried to have the girl declared incompetant & make her a ward of the hospital? Her parents were kept from seeing her, her cell phone & other communication devices were taken away, & her parents finally had to covertly help her escape the hospital, because they wouldn't allow her to leave.

After leaving, the family went to another hospital who formally discharged the girl to recuperate at home with her family, & she's been doing well since (it's about a year after her escape).

The scariest thing about the article is that it describes how this is not an isolated case. Similar things have happened at other hospitals in recent years when parents have disagreed with a doctor about their child's care.

There should be stronger laws to protect patients against this kind of thing.

https://www-m.cnn.com/2018/08/13/health/mayo-clinic-escape-1-eprise/index.html?r=https://www-m.cnn.com/2018/08/13/health/mayo-clinic-escape-1-eprise/index.html?r=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cnn.com%2F
 
The scariest thing about the article is that it describes how this is not an isolated case. Similar things have happened at other hospitals in recent years when parents have disagreed with a doctor about their child's care.
I haven't seen that story, but I did read about the others. There absolutely needs to be legislation limiting a Hospitals authority.
 
I read this last night. What a nightmare. Legally an adult, yet still too young to even consider advance directives, power of attorney, living revocable trust, etc. Yet still probably a dependent on parents medical insurance. Would like to see some legislation/safeguards put forth.

I know why the hospital keep patients hostage. $$$$. We've had the unfortunate experiences of ER and then being admitted on Friday night, Saturday, & Sunday. These 3 days are key because nothing major will be considered until Monday morning. It was stabilized until Monday. 14 days in the hospital = $500,000 without insurance.
 
I read it and it’s beyong scary. Something along the same line happened with a coworker. She had a young son with a serious rare condition that needed an operation. She wasn’t comfortable with the local doctors approach and wanted a second opinion. The doctor and hospital balked and then when she wanted to transfer him to her hometown children’s hospital, which is nationally recognized and had a specialist ready and waiting to admit her son, they refused. The hospital social worker told her if she proceeded with her complaints and threats to transfer they would seek emergency removal of her son and place him in foster care. The children’s hospital actually got involved and with the aid of a lawyer she was able to finally have him transferred. That new doctor recommended a different surgery and post care approach and said the first hospital was way off with their plan. It was a good thing they pushed for a transfer.

I can’t imagine someone threatening to take my sick child away from me just because I questioned a medical decision and wanted a second opinion. These were professional, extremely educated parents with other children and they had a plan in place to leave the hospital, get directly on a plane, and get to the next hospital, and his condition didn’t require an emergency treatment, there was no course to treat them as negligent parents%. ...I could not believe it when they first told us.
 


Wow, that is the longest 2-part news article I've read. :surfweb: It needs a Cliff Notes version as it reads like a movie of the week. :laughing:

However, having made it through it all, I might have been skeptical if it hadn't been for the many, many, many different expert sources the reporter checked with to weigh in on the case, all coming to the same conclusion, that this was definitely an "improper" holding of an adult patient against her will, and even the WAY they tried to get guardianship over her WITHOUT going to a judge to get a court ruling - in which ANY judge would have given guardianship to a FAMILY MEMBER first, was against all medical, ethical and legal procedures. :sad2:

All ELEVEN different sources below were in agreement:

(Snipping near the last section of the article):

"To understand the legal and ethical issues in Alyssa's case, CNN showed experts key documents, including law enforcement reports; a transcript of portions of CNN's interview with Sherwin, the detective at the Rochester Police Department; and summaries of her care written by doctors at Mayo and Sanford.

The experts emphasized that those documents don't tell the whole story; only a thorough reading of her full medical records and interviews with Mayo staff would provide a complete picture.

"You're only hearing one side," cautioned Dr. Chris Feudtner, a professor of pediatrics, medical ethics and health policy at the University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine.

After reviewing the documents, the experts wondered why Mayo did not allow Alyssa, who was 18 and legally an adult, to leave the hospital when she made clear that she wanted to be transferred, according to the family.
They said that typically, adult patients have the right to leave the hospital against medical advice, and they can leave without signing any paperwork.
"Hospitals aren't prisons. They can't hold you there against your will," said George Annas, an attorney and director of the Center for Health Law, Ethics & Human Rights at the Boston University School of Public Health.

But Alyssa's doctors say she wasn't a typical patient.
"Due to the severity of her brain injury, she does not have the capacity to make medical decisions," her doctors wrote in her records after she'd left the hospital.

In that report, the doctors specified that assessments in the last week of her hospital stay showed that she lacked "the capacity to decide to sign releases of information, make pain medication dose changes, and make disposition decisions. This includes signing paperwork agreeing to leave the hospital against medical advice."

That hadn't jibed with the captain of investigations for the Rochester police. Sherwin said it didn't make sense that Mayo staffers told police Alyssa had been making her own decisions, yet in the discharge note, they stated she wasn't capable of making her own decisions.

It didn't jibe with the experts, either.

"They can't eat their cake and have it, too," said Feudtner, the medical ethicist at the University of Pennsylvania.
Even if Alyssa truly did lack the capacity to make her own medical decisions, the experts had questions about Mayo's efforts to obtain emergency guardianship for Alyssa.

Brian Smith, the Rochester police officer who responded to Mayo's 911 call the day Alyssa left Mayo, said a Mayo social worker told him she'd been working for a week or two to get a Minnesota county to take guardianship over Alyssa.

"The county would have guardianship over her and would make decisions for her," he told CNN.

If that happened, Alyssa most likely would have stayed at Mayo, as she was already receiving treatment there, Smith said.

Bush-Seim, the Rochester police investigator, spoke with an official at one of the county adult protection agencies. She said it was also her understanding that Mayo wanted the county to take guardianship of Alyssa, or that perhaps Mayo itself wanted to directly take guardianship of her.

The legal experts said they were not surprised that Mayo was unable to get court orders for such guardianship arrangements. It's a drastic and highly unusual step for a county or a hospital to take guardianship over a patient, they said, rather than have a family member become the patient's surrogate decision-maker.

Robert McLeod, a Minneapolis attorney who helped the state legislature draft its guardianship laws, did not review the documents pertaining to Alyssa, as he did not want to comment on any specific case.

He said that before appointing a county or a hospital as a legal guardian, a judge would ask why a family member or close friend hadn't been selected as a surrogate.

"From my 25 years of experience, a judge is going to say, 'why isn't the family the first and best choice here?' and it had better be a good reason," said McLeod, an adjunct professor at the Mitchell Hamline School of Law in Saint Paul, Minnesota.

Other experts agreed.
Saver, the professor at the University of North Carolina School of Law, said that in his four years working in the general counsel's office at the University of Chicago Hospitals and Health System, he doesn't once remember the hospital seeking guardianship for a patient who had a responsible relative or friend who could act as surrogates.

"It's thought of as kind of the atom bomb remedy," Saver said. "I'm a little flummoxed what to make of this. They had family members on the scene to look to."

Alyssa said her biological father, Jason Gilderhus, told her that Mayo asked him to become her guardian. He did not become her guardian and did not respond to CNN's attempts to reach him.

Even if Mayo had concerns about Alyssa's mother and her biological father didn't work out, there were other friends and relatives to turn to, such as her stepfather, grandmother, great-grandmother, aunt or boyfriend's mother.
"It's so baffling why they didn't try to designate a surrogate before trying to get a guardian," added Dr. R. Gregory Cochran, a physician and lawyer and associate director of the Health Policy and Law program at the University of California, Hastings College of the Law in San Francisco.

Another feature of Alyssa's case also surprised the experts.
Caplan, the NYU bioethicist, said that in complicated and contentious cases like this one, doctors typically reach out to their hospital's ethics committee for help.

An ethics committee would listen to the doctors, other staff members, the patient and the family to try to resolve the conflict.

The family says no one ever mentioned an ethics committee to them, and there's no mention of an ethics committee consult in the discharge summary in Alyssa's medical records.

Annas, the lawyer at Boston University, agreed that an ethics committee consultation would have been an obvious and important way to help resolve the dispute before it spun out of control.
"Disputes between families and hospital staff happen all the time, and they can either escalate or de-escalate," Annas said. "An ethics consult can help sort out the issues so they de-escalate."

The experts said they were disappointed that in Alyssa's case, the conflict escalated.

"I was shocked to see that parents had to pull a fast one to get their daughter out of the hospital," said Cochran, of the University of California.

"I felt sad," said Feudtner, the ethicist at the University of Pennsylvania. "Viewed in its entirety, this did not go well for anybody who was involved."
Gaalswyk, the former Mayo board member, said he hopes the hospital learns something.

"I hope that someone somewhere will look at what happened in this unfortunate case and improve both our Mayo employee's actions and patient systems so that it not need happen again to any other patient at Mayo," he wrote a Mayo vice president after Alyssa left the hospital. "The situation need not get out of hand like it did.""

[. . .]

"Dr. Julia Hallisy, founder of the Empowered Patient Coalition, says families often tell her that a hospital won't allow their loved one to transfer to another facility. Often, they're afraid to say anything publicly or on social media.
"You sound like a crazy person -- that your family member was held hostage in an American hospital," she said. "People can't believe that would happen. It's like the stuff of a science fiction story.""​


(Skipping to end):

[. . .]
"Alyssa has not filed a lawsuit, but has engaged Martin, the lawyer who is also representing the Pelletier family.

Alyssa and her parents say they haven't recovered emotionally from what happened at Mayo. They say they still sometimes wake up in the middle of the night, panicked about what would have happened if they hadn't snuck her out of the hospital.

"I think she would be [at the hospital] and nobody would be able to see her," her stepfather said.

They say Mayo still hasn't given them an explanation for why it was trying to arrange guardianship for Alyssa.

They think Mayo was trying to get guardianship in retaliation for questioning the staff, especially a senior physician.

"I think that the doctor I made mad wanted to make sure that I paid for it no matter what," her mother said.

She's told that's a pretty hefty accusation.

"We stand by it 100 percent," her stepfather said."​


:sad2:


I already don't think much of the Mayo Clinic, even before reading the article. They have symptoms & diagnosis website. Every time I looked up something, if a remedy isn't a prescribed drug by a pharmaceutical, (who'd profit off of it AND need more follow up appointments with doctors for refill prescriptions, :rolleyes1 ) the Mayo Clinic doesn't recognize it as a proper treatment.

Thank goodness MY integrative medicine doctor doesn't follow their recommendations. :thumbsup2 I'm doing fine now with the cocktail remedy I'm on with both prescriptions & natural supplements he has me on.
 
Last edited:
The whole story is very incomplete, though. We are hearing one side of the story from a couple of parents who did enough to upset the Mayo Clinic that they felt it was appropriate to get a court ordered restraining order against them. The girl in their care is clearly not well, as she struggled greatly to get into her car as they "escaped" from the hospital. I hope that this is the end of the story, and that she will not have to be readmitted for care, but am not confident that that is the case.
 
I know why the hospital keep patients hostage. $$$$.

I wondered that too. If the parents had figured out a way to cancel their daughter's insurance, would the Mayo Clinic have kept her, even with that doctor wanting revenge for questioning his medical decisions & the others on staff? I have a feeling they would have said, "Good riddance!" instead and couldn't kick her out the door fast enough.
 
The whole story is very incomplete, though. We are hearing one side of the story from a couple of parents who did enough to upset the Mayo Clinic that they felt it was appropriate to get a court ordered restraining order against them. The girl in their care is clearly not well, as she struggled greatly to get into her car as they "escaped" from the hospital. I hope that this is the end of the story, and that she will not have to be readmitted for care, but am not confident that that is the case.

As a follow up to that, it thankfully does look like she is now doing well. I almost did the same thing with my son when he was 1, but was able to keep my cool. Think of an alternative version of this story, though, where they release her and she has some other issue. In that case, the clinic could have been held liable. The whole medical malpractice system has a lot of hospitals nervous about releasing patients.
 
The whole story is very incomplete, though. We are hearing one side of the story from a couple of parents who did enough to upset the Mayo Clinic that they felt it was appropriate to get a court ordered restraining order against them. The girl in their care is clearly not well, as she struggled greatly to get into her car as they "escaped" from the hospital. I hope that this is the end of the story, and that she will not have to be readmitted for care, but am not confident that that is the case.

There's a part at the end that I didn't include that says hows she's been doing. She was still receiving physical therapy for quite a while after. But, she wasn't isolated and taken away from her parents. And physical therapy is a far cry from being "gravely ill and about to die without immediate treatment" that the Mayo Clinic told the police was the reason she needed to be found and brought back immediately.
 
Think of an alternative version of this story, though, where they release her and she has some other issue. In that case, the clinic could have been held liable. The whole medical malpractice system has a lot of hospitals nervous about releasing patients.

But, the parents and the adult daughter originally asked that she be transferred to another hospital. I'm not a doctor, but I don't think the clinic would have been held responsible once a patient is safely transferred? :confused:
 
As a follow up to that, it thankfully does look like she is now doing well. I almost did the same thing with my son when he was 1, but was able to keep my cool. Think of an alternative version of this story, though, where they release her and she has some other issue. In that case, the clinic could have been held liable. The whole medical malpractice system has a lot of hospitals nervous about releasing patients.

She signed a release against medical advice though. That doesn’t guarantee they won’t have a lawsuit, but it goes a long way to say you are no longer the responsibility of the hospital and they are no longer accountable for your care.

It says A LOT that they went to two counties to get guardenship and failed, that a second hospital evaluated her that evening and said she was fine to go home despite Mayo claiming she would die within hours, and that the local police repeatedly stated the hospital was in the wrong. So you aren’t getting the complete other side but you are getting 2 county judges, a second hospital, and the police side which all align with the families.
 
It says A LOT that they went to two counties to get guardenship and failed, that a second hospital evaluated her that evening and said she was fine to go home despite Mayo claiming she would die within hours, and that the local police repeatedly stated the hospital was in the wrong. So you aren’t getting the complete other side but you are getting 2 county judges, a second hospital, and the police side which all align with the families.

And one of them, the hospital, is a medical opinion. :thumbsup2
 
But, the parents and the adult daughter originally asked that she be transferred to another hospital. I'm not a doctor, but I don't think the clinic would have been held responsible once a patient is safely transferred? :confused:

She signed a release against medical advice though. That doesn’t guarantee they won’t have a lawsuit, but it goes a long way to say you are no longer the responsibility of the hospital and they are no longer accountable for your care.

It says A LOT that they went to two counties to get guardenship and failed, that a second hospital evaluated her that evening and said she was fine to go home despite Mayo claiming she would die within hours, and that the local police repeatedly stated the hospital was in the wrong. So you aren’t getting the complete other side but you are getting 2 county judges, a second hospital, and the police side which all align with the families.

In all honesty, this looks really bad for the hospital, and probably is. Most likely an ego-driven doctor. When I see sensational stories like these, though, I automatically go thinking of what the rest of the story could possibly be. That's what I'm doing here. What we have is a story presented by parents, as well as analysis by people who are judging from the sidelines. We may never know the whole story, which does not look good for the Mayo Clinic, but I am just looking for any other possibilities before jumping to judgement.
 
In all honesty, this looks really bad for the hospital, and probably is. Most likely an ego-driven doctor. When I see sensational stories like these, though, I automatically go thinking of what the rest of the story could possibly be. That's what I'm doing here. What we have is a story presented by parents, as well as analysis by people who are judging from the sidelines. We may never know the whole story, which does not look good for the Mayo Clinic, but I am just looking for any other possibilities before jumping to judgement.

I get it..I’m usually the worlds worst (best?) devils advocate, but this was one of the most well researched articles I’ve read in a long time and had so many official documents and reports backing it up. If it had been just one or two odd things, but here thing after thing pointed to an out of control pattern of people who thought they could behave however they wanted.
 
I get it..I’m usually the worlds worst (best?) devils advocate, but this was one of the most well researched articles I’ve read in a long time and had so many official documents and reports backing it up. If it had been just one or two odd things, but here thing after thing pointed to an out of control pattern of people who thought they could behave however they wanted.

Yeah I'll agree. This doesn't look good at all. Just wanted to throw a little skepticism in there to make sure everyone didn't jump 100% into seeing this as the whole truth without any information coming from Mayo Clinic. It does seem fishy that they aren't releasing anything, though, despite the news coverage. It does imply guilt on their part.
 
In all honesty, this looks really bad for the hospital, and probably is. Most likely an ego-driven doctor. When I see sensational stories like these, though, I automatically go thinking of what the rest of the story could possibly be. That's what I'm doing here. What we have is a story presented by parents, as well as analysis by people who are judging from the sidelines. We may never know the whole story, which does not look good for the Mayo Clinic, but I am just looking for any other possibilities before jumping to judgement.

Yep, I get you too. The first 2/3s of the article does read like a script for a Lifetime movie. That's why I said I would have been more skeptical, had it not been for so many professional experts backing up the parents side of the story, from so many different places all over the map, and in different areas of expertise. I also thought the article said that all the experts were given whatever medical records were provided by the Mayo Clinic?
 
The whole story is very incomplete, though. We are hearing one side of the story from a couple of parents who did enough to upset the Mayo Clinic that they felt it was appropriate to get a court ordered restraining order against them. The girl in their care is clearly not well, as she struggled greatly to get into her car as they "escaped" from the hospital. I hope that this is the end of the story, and that she will not have to be readmitted for care, but am not confident that that is the case.
The story was told a year after it happened. The girl is doing well. She later was voted Prom Queen at her school.

CNN did ask Mayo to tell their side, but they refused to talk on the record, despite the patient signing a document giving permission for them to discuss her case.
 
But, the parents and the adult daughter originally asked that she be transferred to another hospital. I'm not a doctor, but I don't think the clinic would have been held responsible once a patient is safely transferred? :confused:
Yes, that seems to be the trend in these cases. Hospitals trying to gain guardianship after parents have requested transfer to another hospital. Outrageous.
 
Last edited:













Receive up to $1,000 in Onboard Credit and a Gift Basket!
That’s right — when you book your Disney Cruise with Dreams Unlimited Travel, you’ll receive incredible shipboard credits to spend during your vacation!
CLICK HERE














DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest DIS Tiktok DIS Twitter

Back
Top