It's one thing to counsel someone on safe sex practices ... that's a universal cause ... with no age, gender, or religous biases. It's no different than counseling someone about any number of things that can kill you. But this thread isn't about safe sex practices and HIV/AIDS or other STD's, this is about birth control pills, there is a difference. Granted they are both sexually related, that's about it. And I think a lot of people are losing the sight that the daughter DID talk to her mom about going on the pill, and the mom said no. That's when the OP stepped in. So it's not like the neighbor's child couldn't talk to her mom, she just didn't like the answer about not having her permission to be on the pill. Maybe they discussed safe sex practices.
Telling someone to practice safe sex is a whole different story than counseling someone about birth control pills and abortion because you feel their mother isn't doing a very good job of doing so, or unwilling to do so, so you will do it for her. That's where the OP crosses the line in my books. That's what this is all about. The child came to her about information about the pill and where she could get it without her parents knowledge or consent AFTER the child had the discussion about wanting to go on the pill the and her mother said no, not the pill. That's when the OP should have handed over a telephone number, or the name of some places for the child to look up herself, then stepped out of the way. But it's done now, it's really a moot point, I have no idea why I'm arguing or defending my stance on the subject.
I have no problem with the OP giving the child the information to go to
someone else to get the information. Someone who is knowledgable about the laws in the state, someone who is knowledgable about ALL sorts of birth control methods and devices and someone who is educated and trained to talk to teens who are curious and trying to hide "things" from their parents. They are the people who may well be the ones to help her if her method of birth control fails, or if there are complications from her birth control etc.
I do however have a problem with the OP going to the health department, gathering information for her, then giving her that information because she dislikes the mother's points of view. I also have a problem with her telling the child "her rights" when it comes to terminating a pregnancy, unless she's an authority on the subject, and obviously she wasn't, very few of us are. Again, that's a discussion to have with people knowledgable about the subject, the laws, etc.
We all want our children to go to someone with problems if they feel they can't come to us (step-children in my case, who are grown and over all of this stuff

). But I *think* we would want them to go to people we respect and trust, someone we think is caring, compassionate and kind, if they feel they can't come to us. Obviously the OP and the neighbor don't think or feel that way about each other. I'm sure the neighbor thinks the OP is just as "whacko" as the OP feels the neighbor is. But remember, the child did go to her mother, the child just didn't like the answer her mother gave her.
Just as an aside: This child not only had a discussion about going on the pill with her mother, but her mother told her how she felt about the subject (I went on the pill when I was 17 and NEVER had that sort of discussion with my mother, I was too scared to because I know my mom would have been overly dramatic about the whole thing

, I just went to Planned Parenthood like the rest of my friends ). This child also has her own car. This child also had the freedom to go to the health department as soon as the neighbor gave her the health department card, without her parents knowledge or permission ... just left to head right over there. If she has that sort of freedom, if she feels free enough to discuss birth control with her mother AND she is finding the time and place to "do IT", can she really be that sheltered?
