No, one thing to keep in mind is that like with most companies, the corporate goals of the Walt Disney Company are often at odds with its customers. FastPass+ certainly had its growing pains as most of us probably had a FastPass+ reservation mysteriously vanish or a resort room door that failed to open upon "touching Mickey to Mickey." But while the launch was expensive and drawn out and plagued with issues, the system is working exactly as designed - to redistribute crowds, ration experiences, and keep as much money on property as possible. That's the ultimate end game.
And all of that is to the detriment of your typical "power user." A common sentiment is that someone used to be able to pull legacy FASTPASSes and ride Toy Story five times and Rock n Roller Coaster four times without waiting very long and can now ride both twice per day so long as they constantly refresh My Disney Experience trying to snipe someone else's canceled FastPass+ in the afternoon. And because they used to be able to do nine things and can now do four things that FP+ is a "failure." But while the end user may be less satisfied, that is exactly what Disney is intending and raises guest satisfaction ratings as those experiences are now given to someone that either wouldn't have been able to experience something or would have waited much longer in standby while the super user heads in to ride first via FASTPASS.
I think if South America was still strong that we would be singing a different tune about the summer. Here is a chart of their currency over the last five years:
Their currency compared to the US dollar is worth less than half of what it was three years ago, which obviously makes a U.S. trip twice as expensive for them. Add heavy taxes on group travel and we've seen a near elimination of the South American tour group. South America would have made up about 25% of attendance over the summer. That number is going to be dramatically lower. On the last earnings call, Iger said that those numbers were canceled out by an increase in attendance from other areas, but that seems like wishful thinking.
But it will be interesting to see what the future holds. I don't think there is much to the idea that Disney is making an active effort to reduce attendance. They are not making all of these improvements in infrastructure - expanding the road outside Disney Springs to ten lanes and adding 100 stores and 15+ restaurants, building new on ramps and expanding park entrances, building more parking lots at Animal Kingdom and Magic Kingdom, adding Toy Story Land and Star Wars Land and Avatar Land and Rivers of Light and Frozen and Galactic Spectacular etc. because the goal is to have fewer people walk through the gates every day. Why would you add a third theater to Soarin' and a third track to Toy Story if you were trying to reduce the number of people in line at the same time? I think you can blame the price increases on the fact that they need to make more money on fewer people to meet earnings estimates. I'm not sure that it's the other way around.
But we will see. This is the kind of thing that Mother says keeps me employed. On the other hand an inability to create an accurate crowd calendar with the limited resources available might soon put me out on the streets.