In the first 5 days of VDH deeds there were 459 deeds recorded (457 VDH and 2 VGC that are hard to filter out).
On those 459 deeds, there are 443 unique grantees and 16 repeated grantees.
Of the 16 repeated grantees, there are actually 12 unique grantees within those 16:
- 1 grantee buying 4 contracts
- 2 grantees buying 3 contracts
- 180pt, split 100-50-30
- 150pt, split 50-50-50
- 9 grantees buying 2 contracts
- 490pt, split 245-245
- 250pt, split 150-100
- 200pt, split 100-100
- 200pt, split 100-100
- 175pt, split 110-65 (this is my favorite, good job whoever this is)
- 175pt, split 100-75
- 170pt, split 85-85
- 150pt, split 100-50
- 150pt, split 75-75
Adds up to:
- 431 grantees buying 1 contract
- 9 grantees buying 2 contracts
- 2 grantees buying 3 contracts
- 1 grantee buying 4 countracts
I think there's a case to be made that the most knowledgable buyers (who are more likely to split contracts) also are more likely to do delayed closings and not show up, but if we're comparing early VDH vs. early PVB2, it's probably apples to apples?
@maui22 you wanna do the PVB2 analysis?
(is this even feasible? I'm not very familiar with occompt)
Anyway, the small avg contract size at VDH was very much an early buyer thing. It's over a year later now and the average over the last 3 months is over 180pts/contract:
View attachment 904591