DVC or BOUNCE BACK/CODES and PINS --whcih is better

shopn24seven

DIS Veteran
Joined
Aug 10, 2008
Messages
1,609
I am trying to decide if the bounce back, AP or public codes and pins work out better than the DVC.

I seem to be lucky and keep getting either bounce back at 40% or pin codes in the mail and I was wondering if one goes TWICE in a 12 month time, spending 15 days or so, is more economical than purchasing the time shares.

Or does it depend on which property you generally like to stay at.
 
You dont get bounceback codes in the mail, only when youre actually on property checked in. The 40% pin looks to be the best out right now unless youre able to go during free dining then youd have to compare the two
 
I have rec'd BB and I have rec'd pin codes.
I was thinkinh those codes would be better than
buying someones POINTS or purchasing teh plan, itself.
 
It is comparing apples to oranges. A DVC is has a full kitchen, jetted tub, separate bathroom, washer and dryer, full bedroom, living room, patio. It is not just a room with a two sinks, toilet and tub. DVC's let you relax in a home setting and you can cook to save money on food. I never do because after all, it is a vacation.
 

You cant RECEIVE a BB. It would be IN your room while youre on property. Are we talking about the same thing here?
 
I didn't say I rec'd a BB in the mail, or I didn't mean to.
I rec's a BB in a Disney room, on a table w dates.
I also have rec'd PINS in my email and CODES on cards in regular mail.


In reagards to cooking...might be nice for some, but I don;t cook on vaca. LOL.
 


Disney Vacation Planning. Free. Done for You.
Our Authorized Disney Vacation Planners are here to provide personalized, expert advice, answer every question, and uncover the best discounts. Let Dreams Unlimited Travel take care of all the details, so you can sit back, relax, and enjoy a stress-free vacation.
Start Your Disney Vacation
Disney EarMarked Producer






DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest DIS Tiktok DIS Twitter
Add as a preferred source on Google

Back
Top Bottom