Mary•Poppins
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2010
- Messages
- 776
I have another job interview next Wednesday, so wish me luck.


I have another job interview next Wednesday, so wish me luck.
Funny how I'm sitting pretty much right at the median income for a family and it's not a lot of money and not great income (it's also combined 2 incomes for us.) That means 50% are worst off than us and I'd bet quite a few are just better than us and not living the high life, so they in the show certainly doesn't strike me as "not unlike a lot of people."I set it on a the dvr and just watched it. My impression is that they are not unlike alot of people. They had a great income.
What bothers me the most about it is that people see these things and let them effect their perceptions of what "poor" looks like.
We do not know what truly poor people look like in this country.
My sympathy waned rapidly when I heard they used to go through $15K-$18K per MONTH on golf, dining out, etc. It waned even further when they said they had nothing to sell as the kids were playing on a ping-pong table. Even further when the kids went dumpster diving and sold their own belongings to make rent while mom & dad were in late-model vehicles and still had jewelry (not to mention the big house they were living in post-bankruptcy). It sank to non-existent when the 16yo was expected to buy $23 in groceries with a $2 food stamp card rather than one of the adults conduct that humiliating transaction. She came home with a packet of GRAVY???
They need a whack upside the head with a frugal stick.
The one thing that really bothered me, was the father's reaction when his step-son sold his baseball glove. That would have brought me to tears, with gratitude and pride, and he showed none of that. He shows skepticism, and I thought that was crass.
While I didn't see the show, I agree that this is a pretty far-fetched concept of "downsized". It's more like "I didn't plan and thought the gravy train would never end."
I do understand that people like this get into a no-win situation: Sure, they've got the big house, but selling it means taking a big loss. If I had to PAY SOMEONE to take my house off my hands, I'd drag my feet on doing it too. Ditto for selling jewelry, cars, etc. Doesn't mean it isn't the right thing to do, but I do think I'd try to hang on for a while, thinking, "I'll get a job soon, and if I wait a while I won't have taken a big loss on ____". I also suspect that the cars might've been leased instead of owned, which'd mean they couldn't get out of the contract for X more months. Ditto for the teens' cell phones. Yeah, it's not the way this family should be spending their money, but if they're halfway through a contract, they're committed to continuing.
I think the real message here is, don't get into this situation. Don't extend yourself so far financially that you'd be sunk if your circumstances changed.
I've watched another show that is much better: Much more middle-class. I think it takes place in Canada. I can't think of the name, but it's about couples whose budgets are out of control. A person comes in and helps them go through their finances, gives them small goals to meet over a couple months, and then IF they improve, they get some money to pay off their debts. Along the way they get "challenges", which are always different depending upon their specific problems. For example, if they're overspending on meals out, they might get cooking lessons, and their challenge might be to plan meals and cook at home. If they're stockpilers who have too much stuff, their assignment might be to hold a yardsale and put the money towards their debt. If they're not working together well financially, their task might be to take over one another's part of the budgeting process.
Often these people have just never figured up what they're making vs. what they're spending. For example, one show was about a two-income family who had a baby, mom gave up her job, but she didn't quit spending as if she still had a job. Another was about a mom who had a compulsive shopping habit, and she was hiding her purchases; that one was complicated by the fact that she earned way more than her husband, so they both felt that she was entitled to spend, spend, spend. Another couple had free housing because the husband's job was caring for a disabled teen, but his job was 24 hours a day, and they were blowing all their money going out on his rare weekends off. They find people in interesting situations. Often these couples are considering separation/divorce because of their financial troubles.
Oh, I know the name: 'Til Debt Do Us Part -- or something like that.
I recommend it.
Agreed. Im not interested in the "real housewives of lower swamp grove" but I made it a point to see what those ladies from new jersey were up to.No they don't, they are getting a nice little fee for this "Acting" job. Do you actually think any "reality" TV is the unvarnished truth?
Gimme a break. "Reality" shows are produced for "shock' value. Would you have watched the thing if they were in a small house, cutting coupons and living a very ho-hum ordinary life.
Would anyone care about Lindsey Lohan if she wasn't a train wreck?
Do yourself a favor, visit your local food bank or homeless shelter, at least get a real picture to extend your sympathies to
I watched this show with my son and his wife and my daughter and her BF. We were all just amazed at the house they were living in, and the fact that these kids, who are mainly over 16, have no job at McD, or a paper route or something. I really don't think they realize what downsizing really is..buying water resrtictors for your shower is fine, but where did the money come from when they were $300 short for rent? And I was a little offended that the mother basically called her teachinig paycheck tiny and how she felt like she wasn't even getting a paycheck. Maybe she is paying expensive healthcare out of it or something, but I was a teacher and yes, not super good pay, but certainly decent and for a contract of less than 190 days it figures out as a decent wage. My DH and I together make about what the average mid paid teacher gets so really, she should adjust her thinking. How about her working an after school program at her school or something? those kids could certianly help around the house, make dinner, etc. since they don't have jobs. Yes, the son sold his glove..and the parents are sitting around with quite a bit of jewelry and stuff. I do hope this show , as it continues, shows them learn how to really make a change. They seem like nice people stuck in a bad situation..the previews for next week show them talking to a financial guy and looking at a smaller house, so that's good. My daughter's BF comes from a family of 7 kids and most of his growing up time was in a 2 BR single wide trailer, so, as awful as that sounds, they survived and are a tight family (which I guess you would have to be)
(PS..wouldn't what they get paid for the show basically fix their financial emergency??)
Agreed. Im not interested in the "real housewives of lower swamp grove" but I made it a point to see what those ladies from new jersey were up to.
I just found an interview with the mother from "downsized". It was done after the show finished filming. http://www.momlogic.com/2010/11/interview_with_downsized_mom_laura_bruce.php
Years
Exp. Bachelors Yearly Masters Yearly Doctorate Yearly
0 $47,500 $48,500 $49,500
1 $47,736 $48,736 $49,736
2 $47,853 $48,853 $49,853
OK so let me see if I have this right. This family was seemingly well-off. Things changed and they need to downsize greatly. However since they were a well-off family, the things they give up aren't nearly as important as what a typical middle class family might have to give up? They aren't poor enough for the BB? Everyone at EVERY income level will feel a pinch at a loss of income. The rich aren't exempt.