Cool-Beans
<marquee behavior=alternate><font color=deeppink>F
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2006
- Messages
- 16,604
This is my problem with it. Nobody is giving anything to God. Saying, "via the church" implies that the money is going to God through the church. It isn't. There is no monetary exchange rate for Heaven, no address to which we can mail a check, and no account to which we can wire the money. God sure isn't showing up to personally accept it...probably because God doesn't need money.WDWHound said:Giving money to God (via the church or whatever other means) is just one part of being a Christian.
When we give, we give it to the church. Saying that we're "giving to God" is false...and that makes me feel like someone is trying to con me into believing something that isn't true.
And saying that people shouldn't worry about their own needs, but give freely, because "God will provide," while asking them to worry about the church's needs is illogical. If individual people don't have to worry, because God is going to provide, then the church doesn't have to worry, either. Certainly God will provide for them, too.
The fact is that often, God doesn't provide. I dunno why, but that's the fact. This leaves a bunch of folks who need to be provided for. So, it is really nice of us to help each other out.
It seems a lot more honest (and effective, I would think) to just say, "We need the money for X and Y...please give it to us!"
I don't know anything about Consecration Sunday. We don't have that in our church. But I like the idea. Every week we get told to bring some specific item for a specific group of people, like "Socks for Mexican immigrants" or "toothbrushes for battered women in shelters." It is a pain to go shopping for church every week and I've often wished they'd just set up a fund for this, so we could contribute once a year and be done with it.
)
