Sorry if I misunderstood, but the way you worded that post seemed to imply that we were just discussing the same points, and so it has made for an old and tired discussion that is no longer valid or relevant.
On the contrary...we are still discussing as we have ideas to share, trip reports or new policy changes (monorail closure, addition of wifi in deluxe resorts), for example. For those of us who have read each and every post in this thread, it is still a relevant discussion, so why not continue to discuss with each other?
Sure there is some overlap or duplication, but that is bound to happen when people are very passionate about something.
We will have to disagree about people becoming bored - so many DIS members don't read the threads they are posting on, and many of them don't continue on if the discussion gets too long. Sure some people move on once they've made their point, but so many get bored of topics very easily and move to another discussion. This thread is huge, so that will scare so many people away from it, which is sad, because there is lots of good info and opinions in here!
I am not saying that Disney should be complacent and arrogant and not offer discounts, but what I am saying is that Disney is the competition that the other hotels are competing with. All of the off-site hotels are trying to secure business from Disney, and they must secure business from Disney as there are far fewer hotels within each brand. The off-site hotels will suffer more with empty rooms than Disney, as Disney has far more rooms, and many different price points for guests to choose. Plus Disney has a pretty much 100% occupancy Vacation Club, which is great for their business.
Your opinion is that on-site hotels are not that amazing, but for millions of guests, on-site is very amazing. Like I said, we know people who only stay on-site, and pay whatever price Disney is asking. Brand loyalty and brand integrity is still pretty high for many guests. This is why we, and many others we know purchased DVC.
You are correct that the Orlando market is vastly different than it used to be, but Disney is still the leader in Orlando. Sure there are lots of other hotels and houses to choose from, but Disney is the competition that all of the other hotels are trying to topple. Honestly, despite what people on this thread believe, it would take a lot to topple Disney in terms of hotel occupancy. So many people will stay at Disney, and only Disney, although there are more empty rooms than before, but that is also because there are more Orlando off-site rooms than ever before too. I wonder when Orlando, including Disney, will reach its hotel saturation point?
Despite all of the competition in Orlando, Disney's hotel rates continue to climb, and I firmly believe that is because they are still getting a huge number of guests staying on-site. We go for 2 weeks each July during peak season, and being DVC, we have stayed everywhere, especially Deluxe resorts that are both cash/DVC, and they are always sold out both cash and DVC. Guests are staying on-site especially during peak seasons. The past few years they have been securing these guests with lots of promos, especially Free Dining, but it works! Just visit the Resort forum when FD comes out, and you'll see the hysteria, and read about sold out resorts within a few days of the FD promotion starting.
Competition makes for a better consumer experience, so it's great that there are lots of Orlando hotels, including Disney, at varying price points. It would be great if Disney room rates were lower across the board, all year round as a direct result of off-site rooms, but there doesn't seem to be a direct correlation during certain times of the year, eg. peak seasons, as Disney still gets guests to pay astronomical rates for Christmas or NYE.
It's all so interesting, and I would love to see the actual numbers! Tiger![]()
Hi Tiger,
Sorry, I think I originally missed this post.
You are right about Disney rooms sold out during specific busy times and we all know why, when parks close to capacity on busiest days you better be onsite guest or you will not get in. Also extra hours are essential during those times.
As for free dining panics, you just confirmed my point, every time this promotion comes out people just book like crazy, it is sale and everyone wants to take advantage of it, exactly what Disney expects to happen. And when there is no discounts, many stay off site. I do not have numbers but I can tell strictly from observations of empty rooms from year to year at CBR, it is just not as busy as it used to be.
I do not own DVC, but if I wanted to buy I would also go with Disney but not because I am so loyal or I would pay anything just to be onsite, it is not a privilege. I would buy from Disney simply because it is investment, 40 years, no less investment, and I would go with a company that I know was in business so long that I will feel that my investment is secured. I could save with offsite vacation club, but in a long run, I would loose as offsite clubs sometimes go down and may not survive 40 years mark. So I can not answer for everyone but many have exact same attitude when it comes to investments and it has nothing to do with loyalty.
Anyway, because DVC is reather consideration of what WILL happen, instead of what IS happening now, I do not feel that DVC members in any way can be a good support for Disney price raise. Consideration is to those families who want to spend or save today on those 7 days in Disney and many switch from onsite to offsite because price raise.