LuluLovesDisney
<font color=red>If you're not outraged, you're not
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2005
- Messages
- 5,275
To topic title:
Nope ~ I think expectations have gone up.
I think there is too much:
"Why would Disney let it rain? Don't they know this is my vacation?"
"Do you know how much I paid for this vacation?"
"For what I paid to be here I should get 'X'"
"Why does that family get to do that? MY family should get that"
"Why are the rides so run down?"
"Why are the rides closed for refurbishment while I am there?"
"Disney should give 'X' away for free!"
"Disney should lower prices and give more free stuff!"
I guess for us ~ Disney is just as magical as we allow it to be while there.
It's about making the magic work for you.
But, except for the rides being in disrepair, not one of those complaints is a complain brought up by posters on this thread. This is a straw man argument, making it easier to knock down than our real argument.
I don't want anything free. I don't want more than another family. I want Disney to maintain the standards IT set for ITSELF.
How can Disney teach marketing classes to other company executives on customer service anymore? When I was a former CM in Traditions we learned things like if a piece of garbage was on the ground, the CM in that vicinity should pick it up immediately and there were so many custodial CMs that you never saw a mess for a long period of time and never overflowing garbage cans. This was even parodied on the WDW episode of Roseanne, where she tossed popcorn to see how fast the still-smiling CM could sweep it up. Since 1983 I never saw overflowing garbage cans until 2009. It is a change for the worse.
When I was a CM, I would often see the CMs we called Super Greeters. They walked around just to offer directions, give a little advice, make sure guests were happy. We used to have Guest Service Recovery cards. If someone dropped their popcorn or ice cream, they would have a new one for free and we would clean it up asap.
I haven't seen a SuperGreeter anywhere in the parks during my last 3 trips.
The "honey" smell on Winnie the Pooh is gone.
Resort specific merchandise is gone.
The Epcot Christmas lights and tree lighting ceremony are gone.
Prime rib and other items on the buffet that were widely enjoyed are gone.
Benches are being removed.
Portions are being reduced.
Holiday decorations are being reduced.
etc, etc.
I don't want to be family of the day or get anything for free. I just do not want Disney to take anything ELSE away. I mean at what point does it become impossible to ignore. If they decide that EMH is not profitable and they cut it out, is that ok? What if they got rid of the Dapper Dans? What if they reduced the parades to two days a week only? Or got rid of them entirely? What if they decided to close one of the four parks one day a week each to save money? What if they decided to remove the entertainment from 'Ohana to save money? What if they decided to charge extra for meeting Mickey and Minnie and autographs like some baseball players do? Is that ok? Business ethics and all? Is Disney still as magical as YOU make it?
NO. When Walt Disney said we need people to make that dream a reality he was talking about CAST MEMBERS not guests! Guests are there to enjoy the show.
All this talk about saving money is understandable given the economy, but we need to remember that this is not the heart of what made Disney great.
Quoted from http://disney.go.com/disneyatoz/familymuseum/collection/insidestory/inside_1946c.html
Walt equipped the property with a red barn (modeled after his family's barn back in Marceline) with woodworking and machine tools. He also enlisted the aid of studio staffers like Roger Broggie, who had established the Disney Studio machine shop (and whose son is author Michael Broggie). He decided that it would be more exciting if the tunnel were shaped like an S -- so that riders wouldn't be able to see the light at the end when they entered it. One worker advised Walt that it would be cheaper to build the tunnel straight. "No," said Walt, in a classic Disney response, "it's cheaper not to do it at all."
and that doesn't mean I think they should save money by removing the railroad, either.