bicker said:
And again, my point is that it is not "equally" dangerous. Sugar is a lot more dangerous.
For some.
Sugar is "dangerous" in huge quantities, without the balance of healthy stuff too. And without regular exercise. At least it's a known entity.
Artificial sweeteners, for many, are actually debilitating. I would prefer to limit intake of "sweets" altogether than ingest something that causes me headaches and fatigue. I used to think I was just weird, but there are tons of cases of this, and I'm not feeding that junk to my kids.
Back to the OP's question -- to me, it's all relative and in balance. I'd rather give my kids the pudding than a candy bar. At least there's calcium. And I'd just not give them the pudding every day -- rotate other stuff into the snack lineup. Popcorn (since WHEN is popcorn not healthy??), raw veggies, crackers and cheese, fresh fruit. It's the pattern of healthy eating that's important, not one snack on one day.
Wanted to add -- it has occurred to me that different people have differing ideas about what "healthy" means. For some, low fat. (so fat-free cookies, cakes, pudding, jello, etc would be healthy) Others, low or no sugar. (Cheese, sugar free yogurt, etc.) Still others believe healthy means no artificial ingredients, or all the way to totally organic for everything.