Do you think you might be a little over sensitive to stuff like that?
I think most of us will move on rather than getting into an argument to the point of a locked thread.
And, some moderators will lock a thread to keep the info in an already existing thread, not because it was contentious.
My further observation is in life (and on forums) you take the good with the bad and sift out what is relevant for you. Lots of different personalities and age groupings here. Even in Moderator duties, you will see some that don't tolerate much and others that know when to step in, yet can allow a thread to develop with some off topic discussion.
If everything was cut and dried, a lot of knowledgeable people here might just find it too boring to hang around.
Not really. It's all water off my back, and I honestly don't care about most people's opinions. But, for someone new to DVC and the admittedly complicated nature of things, disparate and conflicting responses to a question really don't offer insight or education. And I was speaking specifically about those threads locked because they become too contentious, not because the info is already available elsewhere. They do exist, and they are not uncommon.
If you're asking about ways to utilize points, or the best way to stretch points, or opinions on use years or resorts, then every opinion has merit. But if the question is of a more cut-and-dried "Can I or can't I" or "What is the deadline or requirement to do this" nature, where improper advice can have real economic or other consequences, then people jumping in with their own interpretation of the rules serves no purpose.
There are literally two threads currently focusing on housekeeping security checks and the expectation of privacy, with more than the usual number of "I'm not a lawyer, but here's my legal opinion" posts. Granted, that's just an exercise in argumentation, but the topic could be, and often has been, about issues of greater and real importance regarding the purchase and utilization of points.
"Taking the good with the bad" is the very nature of the problem. You have been a member for 18 years, and enjoy the knowledge and experience to differentiate between the two. For someone who's been here 18 days, how do they know what's good or bad? That person doesn't have the benefit of experience.
I'm not suggesting that vigorous debate and disparate opinions are a bad thing, and I agree that they are the lifeblood of a healthy, interesting, entertaining, and educational forum environment. But, as a member of a number of online forums I find that this one can be more contentious than many, and the stakes can be higher if bad advice is proffered and followed.