I think it's closer to 25,000-30,000 acres; about 45 square miles. But, yes, only a third has been developed.If I remember right a book I read, They own 76,000 acres. On the behind the scene tour we took, The guide said that 1/3 was developed, 1/3 was for conservation and 1/3 could be developed yet.
A common size reference to WDW is that it is twice the size of Manhattan. There is room for dozens of additional parks and/or hotels. That said, I don't expect any additional parks anytime in the near future.
I think it's closer to 25,000-30,000 acres; about 45 square miles. But, yes, only a third has been developed.
This is correct."The property covers 27,258 acres (43 sq mi; 110 km2)"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walt_Disney_World
"The property covers 27,258 acres (43 sq mi; 110 km2)"
The original acreage of the Reedy Creek Improvement District, which is where WDW is situated, was 27,258, however the RCID, or what we think of as WDW, is now just under 25,000 acres or 38.7 sq. mi. https://www.rcid.org/This is correct.
After I posted that I started to figure and what I had would have been 118 Sq miles, 45 sq miles sounds a lot closer. Still huge if you figure 45 sq miles.I think it's closer to 25,000-30,000 acres; about 45 square miles. But, yes, only a third has been developed.
It's shown on the first page of the link I posted which is an official RCID website. Here it is. https://www.rcid.org/since he likely gets his figures from the source.