Thank you to everyone for giving us a thoughtful and insightful thread in where the OP and others gave us facts and speculation based on known facts and not off of pure emotion or wishful thinking. One of the nicest reads for me in a while.
Great analysis.
It makes perfect sense now but I had never even thought of the possibility that there may not even be enough people available to work to enable Disney to open a 5th gate. I do see even more methods of utilising staff better coming. For example the trial on being able to go straight to your resort room after completing online check-in and having a magic band. This would free up more staff to assist with other queries.
Great analysis.
It makes perfect sense now but I had never even thought of the possibility that there may not even be enough people available to work to enable Disney to open a 5th gate. I do see even more methods of utilising staff better coming. For example the trial on being able to go straight to your resort room after completing online check-in and having a magic band. This would free up more staff to assist with other queries.
Labor availability and cost are certainly drivers, especially in this unique scenario.
But I would think that a 5th gate leading to cannibalization of the existing 4 is a major concern, too. WDW parks don't just compete with attractions of other companies, they compete with each other. Sure, every dollar in belongs to them, but so does every expense.
If this thread had been posted on that "other section" then it would be...
Labor is and has been one of the biggest concerns since the 90's expansions....
If its not the #1 thing guarding against the rampant expansion/construction that is always casually proposed on this and other geekdom boards... Then it's at least 1A.
20 years ago they had this destination disney system concept that they put alot of R&D into...early in the ving card system and even before the electronic tickets went into effect...
One of the concepts was the "employeeless" resort process...where hypothetically you would get these snazzy cards in the mail... And then Walk through a large scanner/ computer transponder when you got to the hotel...think of the customs house at Caribbean as being the ideal spot...and poof...your cars were active and you were free to go to room or park without a crew of thousands of employees to stem the hectic flow and cut out what at the time was a 30-45 minute process...
That was just one idea and the prototype never made it off the ground as often the case...
But look at the place now...the basic principle is largely in place.
You'll see reductions in staff across the board...I'm guessing fairly quickly... Once the bands get fortified and the system shakes out.
Why have 60,000 nametags standing in obselete locations doing less? At a higher rate of pay (not so much but still) and a much higher benefit and support staff cost?
People will be livid at the idea that the great benevolent disney would slash "cast" for mere money...but they will and have too...there just is no labor scenario where an increase in raw numbers works for any party involved...
Now...the small optimist in me hopes that means they expand and use "reductions" to staff new offerings..to make new revenues
That's a solid business plan and works for everyone.
Labor is and has been one of the biggest concerns since the 90's expansions....
If its not the #1 thing guarding against the rampant expansion/construction that is always casually proposed on this and other geekdom boards... Then it's at least 1A.
20 years ago they had this destination disney system concept that they put alot of R&D into...early in the ving card system and even before the electronic tickets went into effect...
One of the concepts was the "employeeless" resort process...where hypothetically you would get these snazzy cards in the mail... And then Walk through a large scanner/ computer transponder when you got to the hotel...think of the customs house at Caribbean as being the ideal spot...and poof...your cars were active and you were free to go to room or park without a crew of thousands of employees to stem the hectic flow and cut out what at the time was a 30-45 minute process...
That was just one idea and the prototype never made it off the ground as often the case...
But look at the place now...the basic principle is largely in place.
You'll see reductions in staff across the board...I'm guessing fairly quickly... Once the bands get fortified and the system shakes out.
Why have 60,000 nametags standing in obselete locations doing less? At a higher rate of pay (not so much but still) and a much higher benefit and support staff cost?
People will be livid at the idea that the great benevolent disney would slash "cast" for mere money...but they will and have too...there just is no labor scenario where an increase in raw numbers works for any party involved...
Now...the small optimist in me hopes that means they expand and use "reductions" to staff new offerings..to make new revenues
That's a solid business plan and works for everyone.
Labor is and has been one of the biggest concerns since the 90's expansions....
If its not the #1 thing guarding against the rampant expansion/construction that is always casually proposed on this and other geekdom boards... Then it's at least 1A.
20 years ago they had this destination disney system concept that they put alot of R&D into...early in the ving card system and even before the electronic tickets went into effect...
One of the concepts was the "employeeless" resort process...where hypothetically you would get these snazzy cards in the mail... And then Walk through a large scanner/ computer transponder when you got to the hotel...think of the customs house at Caribbean as being the ideal spot...and poof...your cars were active and you were free to go to room or park without a crew of thousands of employees to stem the hectic flow and cut out what at the time was a 30-45 minute process...
That was just one idea and the prototype never made it off the ground as often the case...
But look at the place now...the basic principle is largely in place.
You'll see reductions in staff across the board...I'm guessing fairly quickly... Once the bands get fortified and the system shakes out.
Why have 60,000 nametags standing in obselete locations doing less? At a higher rate of pay (not so much but still) and a much higher benefit and support staff cost?
People will be livid at the idea that the great benevolent disney would slash "cast" for mere money...but they will and have too...there just is no labor scenario where an increase in raw numbers works for any party involved...
Now...the small optimist in me hopes that means they expand and use "reductions" to staff new offerings..to make new revenues
That's a solid business plan and works for everyone.
Imagine a scenario where check-in is virtual. Passengers arriving at MCO have the option to board a bus for a park (where they can start swiping their MBs in front of point-of-purchase devices) instead of a resort, while their luggage goes to their resort by truck.
Disney doesn't have to staff to check these guests in physically. They also don't have to transport guests to the resort just for check-in, and then transport them to a park.
bleeding to death in a ditch, as non sequiturs continued to pile on top until cyrano decided to kill it...
Um... so I'm the only one stuck on what TDO means?
It's not on this list:
http://www.disboards.com/showthread.php?t=1660743
And the Google... it does nothing.
Edit: Team Disney Orlando. Never mind.
I doubt I'm going out on a limb by saying I bet MM+ and its potential to shift staff priorities within TDO is a rather large topic of conversation in the CM break rooms and over beers after work....
I doubt I'm going out on a limb by saying I bet MM+ and its potential to shift staff priorities within TDO is a rather large topic of conversation in the CM break rooms and over beers after work....
I've often wondered why the parks don't use more vending machines in lieu of manned carts for drinks, especially with CC capability. I know there is upsell potential on every interpersonal transaction, but other factors seem to cut against that - location, convenience, employee cost, etc.