morethananyonex
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Jun 21, 2009
- Messages
- 2,870
Beneficial to who?
I tend to think that if you have a 5 year old and you just saved up enough to go to WDW for the first time (and might not go again for a long time if at all)...seeing Winnie the Pooh in person would be much more alluring than TT or Soarin.
You say beneficial as in "what would save you the most time in line", but you're assuming that all people care about the same rides as you. To many many people, skipping a M&G line with an anxious child is more beneficial than going on a "kind-of thrill ride".
So again, why is the Character Spot not just as popular as Soarin' and TT? Why is it not pulling hoards of people away from booking Soarin' and TT FP+, like apparently Pooh and Tigger will? Why did the tiers have to be implemented at all, because plenty of tier 2 options should appeal to families with small children because of their names (Nemo, Crush, etc) more than Soarin or TT would? What about Beauty and the Beast fans who are still not booking Beauty and the Beast FP+ in huge numbers?
You keep talking about this as if Pooh and Tigger can only be found at this one spot. They are at Crystal Palace, 1900 Park Fare breakfast (I think Pooh is?), outside the Winnie the Pooh ride, and they were at AK until this new FP+ business kicked them out of their spot in favour of Donald and Daisy. That's just off the top of my head, they may be elsewhere too.
I mean, you started off saying that anybody with a Pooh loving child is definitely going to be booking this instead of Soarin' or TT, so why have the Mickey, Goofy, Minnie, Belle, Fantasmic, Nemo, Crush, and Michael Jackson
loving children not been pulling bookings away from the big rides in DHS and Epcot?
