The Guideline to produce only sixty five episodes of any Disney Channel program was conceived and enacted during the earliest days of Michael Eisners leadership as a way to produce a large quantity of material in a relatively short period of time for a channel that would broadcast only first party material. For reasons unknown, said guideline was immediately enforced as if it were policy. Later it become actual policy.
The sixty five episode rule as it will be referred to hereafter, was originally meant to be discontinued after there would be enough filler material for Disney Channel to allow focus on investing in high rated programs. The sixty five episode rule accomplished its goal shortly after the cancellation of the Disney Channel program Darkwing Duck in 1992. For reasons unknown, the sixty five episode rule has been kept not only beyond that timeline, but throughout Michael Eisners leadership as CEO of Disney, and even continues to this day.
Intelligent business practice would be to invest in and market programs that receive the highest ratings, and to continue to do until such time as said programs are no longer profitable. I believe to do otherwise is not only anti-creative, hurting fans, but anti-business, hurting you. The sixty five episode policy was useful until the time of around 1992, after which it became self destructive, a fact which has not changed with the passing of time.
Again, I totally disagree, I mean, obviously Disney is doing just fine as a business, they are a very smart business and they know what's working & what's not.
It's very understandable that they would want to get new stuff out there all the time, therefore having to get rid of some of the old stuff.
I still don't see how this is anti-creative (and/or hurting fans?) everything on the Disney Channel (cancelled or not cancelled) has been highly creative and original. And I don't find it hurtful when they cancel programs that I enjoy, if I really enjoyed watching them, I don't mind watching repeats.
Which is why I have Boy Meets World on DVD
I'm reading the description on the website that you posted earlier right now and I think alot of it is quite overdramatic and frankly, very opinion based.
If Disney WERE to stop this rule and bring back old cartoons, like Goof Troup for example, it would not be the same and people would continue to complain even further. So I see no sense in trying to stop Disney in doing what seems to be working very well for not only them, but for most of their viewing audience.
And the thing about Greed? I don't really know if it's a greed thing, just a profit thing, any business would do what would be most profitable for them, it's not greed, it's just business.