SeaSpray
Disney World fan since 1976
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2001
- Messages
- 15,143
bicker said:The breakfast price didn't match the supply and demand; that was the mistake I was referring to.
Their experience with breakfast makes it very clear that Disney can come up with a character experience for lunch and dinner that, if priced better perhaps, would be far more profitable than the old normal lunch menu/experience and normal dinner menu/experience they used to provide.
Really? I'll defer to Disney's experts, who have the market research data on that, rather than go on my gut-feel.
I will grant you, though, that it was a nice place to eat. I liked it. I just wouldn't pay as much for it as it seems others would pay for a character experience there.
Thanks for explaining, and I agree with you.

If we're talking profits, then there will be people who will pay that extra amount for a meal with characters. We did it, and enjoyed every single character meal we've ever done.
I'm just extremely disappointed with losing the castle as a regular restaurant for dinner. The new format is totally unappealing to me. Perhaps if they tweak it, I'd return, even if they did still have some characters or something. It's the combination of the limited menu, exhorbitant price increase (although again, it's not only about the cost because if I felt it was even remotely worth it, I'd pay), the overwhelming disappointment from DISers who've done the dinner since the change. It's the combination of all of these factors. If people were coming back raving about the new dinner format, I'm pretty sure I'd be booked there for our May trip.