DIS Shareholders and Stock Info ONLY

[Cfabar1]

Wouldn't that actually be a point in favor of Dana or Alan?

Depends on how you look at it. Earlier above it made it sound like if one doesn't get the job they'll leave.

So, if you give it to Josh, he stays. Film likely goes down to one person, so you save some money and business continues as usual.

Give it to Dana, Josh walks.

I'm not really sure it matters that much either way.

 

[wabbott]

https://www.cnbc.com/2025/10/14/disney-ceo-succession-why-co-ceos-may-be-a-bad-idea.html

Disney has considered a co-CEO structure to replace Bob Iger. Its history may make that a bad idea

Published Tue, Oct 14, 2025 - 6:00 AM EDT - Updated 5 Hours Ago
by Alex Sherman@in/alex-sherman@sherman4949

Key Points

• Disney plans to announce a successor to CEO Bob Iger in early 2026.
• Disney executives Dana Walden and Josh D’Amaro are both frontrunners for the job.
• Naming Walden and D’Amaro as co-CEOs could be an option for the Disney board, but the company’s corporate culture and history of bumpy successions may make the arrangement suboptimal.

 

[OKW Lover]

I'm a bit amused by this story. Yes, co-CEOs are a bad idea. Too much left hand not doing what the right hand wants can happen this way. And even more corporate in-fighting. The organization needs to speak/lead with one voice.