Christine said:
I'm not doing any better at calming myself down. I walk around with a knot in my stomach most of the time, a feeling like I'm going to burst into tears, and high agitation.
Christine, if it's any consolation I'm sure many if not most of us can completely relate to this feeling. I know I can. You'd think two years later it would have lessened (and it has), but I feel the same way every time I hear or see or hear something sad or scary related to cancer.

And since that's almost daily, it makes it hard. I also work with patients who have devastating diagnoses and I tend to take on their emotions too, I can't help it. We've had a lot of oncology patients on our cardiac unit lately.
At my support center they taught us meditation and ways to help calm ourselves down when scary thoughts invade our minds. Unfortunately, I flunked that class.

No, seriously, there were times I was able to meditate and bring my mind to a pleasant place, like during chemo and radiation sessions. I was never too good at it in the middle of the night, say, but I do find that reading and DISing help keep my mind occupied.
One thing I liked that they taught us was this, maybe it will be helpful: Close your eyes, relax, and think of yourself standing in a pleasant place of your choosing. Now picture "roots" growing out of your feet and into the ground - in effect "grounding" yourself. As the roots grow you derive strength from the earth. The sun is shining and you can feel the warmth of the sun. It is a beatiful, pleasant day with happiness in the air. Children are laughing, dogs are barking, a boat toots it's horn as it passes by in the lazy river, etc... Smell the popcorn popping and taste that yummy hot dog. Use all your senses. Stay there for a while and enjoy the peace and the strength you're building. What I like about this is that it can be done anywhere, anytime. If you practice it regularly it does help bring a sense of calmness when you feel like you're spinning out of control.
Pea-n-Me said:
(I am actually taking care of an oncologist tonight, I'll ask him his opinion on the oncogene when he wakes up, LOL, and report back later).
I wanted to say I did talk to my oncologist patient the other morning (his daughter actually had a virulent form of BC in her 30's too). I printed up the info from the Oncogene website and he read through it. He thinks it's a good idea. He said that each case needs to be looked at individually, and likened treatment to having to "get to Main St" -
I loved this analogy. We all have a goal of to "getting to Main St" (surviving cancer). Each person along the way may take a different route, but we do what we have to do to get there.
He also said that looking at the individual characteristics of the tumor is something they've always done and is very helpful in formulating treatment plans. And the more they can look at tumor characteristics, the better. For example he said, someone with a lower stage tumor with higher grade tumor cells or a large number of cells or ominous cells (identified by their genes) is just as worrisome as someone with a higher stage tumor with lower grade cells or less in number or less ominous cells.

He also thought that cost is going to be a definite factor in gene identification as it moves forward. (I know last time we had the discussion here about oncogenes and micrometastases I asked my oncologist if they took that extra step in identification with mine and she said they did, but that it really didn't matter because their recommendations would have been the same in my case).
Now here's something he said I thought was interesting which I'd never heard before, hopefully I can explain it correctly. (I debated about posting it but thought as I usally try to do that although it's scary, maybe it will be helpful to someone.
Warning: if you are a worrier you might not want to read any farther. I am also not claiming this to necessarily be true, but it could be something to think about and ask your own oncologists about).
He explained that when you are staged at the beginning of your illness that stage remains with you. For example, if you are staged at Stage II and later develop a mets you are still a "Stage II with a recurrence", not technically Stage IV. (Does it really matter one way or the other? Probably not, but I had just never heard this before. Has anyone else? I'll have to ask my own oncologist about it). The way he explained it further was that if you have a tumor on your finger and you cut off your finger, the cancer is gone. If you later develop a mets, the distant cancer was there the whole time, even though it didn't show up on tests at the time of staging. I don't know, something about this gave me that familiar knot in my stomach, and I actually left the hospital in tears that morning. I guess I should have told him at the outset of our conversation that I myself was a BC survivor, he didn't know until the end and maybe he wouldn't have been so forthcoming, but nonetheless I found it interesting (btw, when I told him, he got that pained look on his face that we're all too familiar with

). I've thought about this since yesterday morning, and I guess it's why I'm glad I myself had chemo. BTW, Silly Me, he told me his daughter did not have chemo - her invasive tumor was very small but a grade 3 with ominous cells and she elected not to have it (I assume with his guidance; in fact, he had some scary things to say about chemo in and of itself - before he knew about me, of course. That didn't bother me so much, though, because it wasn't anything I didn't already know).
The nurse I drove home with commented how she "couldn't believe" how I could hold my own in this conversation that she overheard with us chatting about staging, grading, genes, tumors, etc, LOL, since those of us in one area of practice don't tend to know a lot about other areas. I told her that, unfortunately, when you get something like this you tend to learn more than you ever cared to know.
I have to say I sincerely hope this post wasn't upsetting to anyone and I apologize if it was.