DisneyRunner2009
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Jul 15, 2009
- Messages
- 2,867
I agree. Bathrooms are in limited supply at DTD.
I don't understand how some people are OK with current bathroom standards at WDW. I assume those people would also be OK with having a dirty bathroom in their resort room when they check in because the people next door have a clean one.
There are expectations that need to be met when we the guest are paying thousands of dollars for a vacation at WDW. If they are not met then we have a right to complain.
Also, maybe dirty bathrooms are a positive feedback loop? A dirty bathroom becomes dirtier faster. For example, somebody might miss the waste basket with their paper towel and just leave it on the floor. However, if the basket is full then a much larger percentage of people leave their paper towel on the floor, thus exacerbating the situation.
I'm ok because :
A I didn't have that problem during my week long trip in October. Never saw a dirty restroom, which makes me think
B It is not the new standard, but something that happens on the rare occasion. Dirty restrooms are not 100% preventable, unless you have an attendant standing by each stall, checking them before letting the next guest in. Some people don't sit, but hover and pee on the seat, and don't clean it up. Some use TP for seat covers, and don't flush it down. Some people apparently mess on the floor and leave it. I didn't see any of that, which doesn't mean it never happens. To me it means it happens on the rare occasion. And sometimes you are just the unlucky one to walk in after someone who is messy. As long as they clean it up fairly promptly I'm ok with it.
This has been my experience also - don't think I've been in any of the restrooms that an attendant hasn't been working away to clean up after some of the slobs that use them - wonder what they do at home - or, gasp, do they turn into neat niks as there is no one to 'clean up' after them???
![]()
Or they could cover it by paying the fat cats at the top a fraction less.
It's ok to reduce pay rates as long as it not yours I guess.
I'm ok because :
A I didn't have that problem during my week long trip in October. Never saw a dirty restroom, which makes me think
B It is not the new standard, but something that happens on the rare occasion. Dirty restrooms are not 100% preventable, unless you have an attendant standing by each stall, checking them before letting the next guest in. Some people don't sit, but hover and pee on the seat, and don't clean it up. Some use TP for seat covers, and don't flush it down. Some people apparently mess on the floor and leave it. I didn't see any of that, which doesn't mean it never happens. To me it means it happens on the rare occasion. And sometimes you are just the unlucky one to walk in after someone who is messy. As long as they clean it up fairly promptly I'm ok with it.
I would question anyone who feels it's alright to accept a $1M+ bonus, but leaves their bathrooms unkept. So the question is not so much cutting pay, but rather making sure your house is in order before accepting exorbitant benefits. There was a time when executives were actually proud of the end results, rather than the value of their compensation package at the end of the year.
I would question anyone who feels it's alright to accept a $1M+ bonus, but leaves their bathrooms unkept. So the question is not so much cutting pay, but rather making sure your house is in order before accepting exorbitant benefits. There was a time when executives were actually proud of the end results, rather than the value of their compensation package at the end of the year.
With the proper leadership, anyone can do their job correctly. Congratulations, you just passed Management 101!So maybe they should fire the janitors. There was also a time when people did their jobs correctly.
It's ok to reduce pay rates as long as it not yours I guess.
But why do that when you can just freeze the "janitors" pay at $10/hour and cut some benefits ....they can't do their job correctly anyway. That should solve the problem.Iger makes upwards of $50 mil a year, he can spare a couple bucks.
I've read on here before (not sure if it is true or not) that some of the not so great smells are some of the plants they use in the parks. Not sure why they would choose to use nasty smelling plants to green up the parks, but I guess it is possible.