thelionqueen said:
3Disneykids...I think the reason for the "hostility" (or just direct posts imo) is that owners pay quite a lot of money for their points/contracts and perks. It seems strange that a renter would assume they have any rights whatsoever to the reservation. As far as Disney is concerned, the owner can cancel or change the reservation at any time. The renter is really the guest of the resort on owner's points, but are not members and should not expect any of the perks of a DVC owner.
I too find it strange that MS would consent to any requests from the renter, not owner, you must have had a great (or new) CM. The only thing I'm allowed (or expect) to have access to is the confirmation of the reservation number and my name on reservation.
If I were to be a DVC owner (definitely will be someday) I would expect the same as the other owners on this thread. REnters get the benefit of staying @ a DVC resort without the huge financial burden of owning a contract or paying annual dues.
As a member using my own points, I call member services once - to make my reservation. When I call, I know what I want, what my alternative choices are, what requests I'm going to make. I know what points will be borrowed and which bank points will be used. Once the CM answers the phone, the transaction is completed in a few minutes.
(Next transaction will be day by day and I'll need to actually make SIX five minute calls - or use up half an hour of MS time - no wonder there is some concern about the stress day by day booking creates on MS.)
When its time to book dining, I book Disney Dining.
With ME, I make a second call closer to the trip when the air is arranged. Another five minute call.
Because members pay for MS CMs from our dues, a lot of members want the process to be quick and smooth. A fifteen minute transaction with the CM, or multiple fifteen minute transactions means that hold times increase and/or more CMs need to be hired. The first inconviences me when I need to call, the second increases my dues (by pennies, but its the principle of the thing). I really don't care if renters are creating inefficiencies in the process or my fellow members are - but renters have less incentive to keep the process efficient, and less knowledge so are less likely to be able to keep the process efficient.
Personally, I'd like to see MS not talk to anyone who can't provide a member number and the last four digits of thie SSN. Renters may be future members, but they aren't members yet, and I don't think MS should be getting in the middle of any transaction - between friends or for cash. There are some things, like ME, that are more efficient if the renter books it, but I still don't think MS should be involved. I don't see it as Disney's job (paid for with my dues - and therefore my job) to make the renter more secure or the renting member's task easier.
This isn't hostility, I just don't like having to contribute to running someone else's profit center (which is what renting is for some people).