- Joined
- Aug 23, 1999
- Messages
- 36,337
This has been an issue with Plan Disney on multiple subjects, not just DAS. Disney puts a disclaimer on the site that basically says the opinions and advice given by the planners is their own opinion and Disney doesn't guarantee the accuracy.My apologies if this has been addressed before. My biggest problem with all of this is the statement in bold. There are old Plan Disney posts that encourage those with MEDICAL conditions to apply for DAS. I understand it's Disney's program and they can change the rules but I find it insulting to say that it was ever only intended for developmental disabilities.
- We will be making efforts to preserve the Disability Access Service (DAS) for those it’s intended to accommodate — only those guests who, due to a developmental disability like autism or similar, are unable to wait in a conventional queue for an extended period of time. To help with this, we are also extending DAS enrollment for eligible guests from 60 days to 120 days and adjusting DAS party size to include no more than four, except for immediate family members.
View attachment 861762View attachment 861763
There is a lot of stuff posted there that is outdated and/or incorrect
I have seen that too in various placesYes. I have definitely heard of non-developmental disabilities being approved for DAS yesterday.
From my memory, it definitely did say you could not record the video. It may have been in the Terms & Conditions. I'm pretty sure though that it was in the message you needed to agree to in order to start the video conversation with the CM.You might want to check on that. My understanding is that since the other party (Disney) has already denied consent to record, you no longer have the right to record without informing the other party -- at which point they have the right to end the call. The 2 key parts of this are italicized.
If you hadn't accepted their T&C, or the T&C did not mention anything about recording, then in a 1-party consent state you could record it without mention.
I'm positive that it was originally added to prevent people from recording the conversation and sharing it on social media.
When DAS first began and all interviews were in person at Guest Relations, 'influencers' were videotaping and, in many cases, live-streaming their interviews. I know at least a couple were told to stop, kept filming and were trespassed.
A lot of people think one of the big reasons 'autism' is specifically mentioned was the lawsuit brought by the families of some autistic individuals when Guest Assistance Card (GAC) changed to DAS in 2013. They started planning their lawsuit before DAS even went into effect.I suppose a good test CMs could use would be does a person's autism make it harder for them to wait in line than the average 3/4 year old, an age group this is expected to wait in the standby lines with no special accommodation.
I suspect that although they have listed autism as a reason for DAS they are working to a level of autism that is more severe than a definition like that.
It is definitely going to be hard to adjust to the new accommodations for people who are used to the old ones, that's for sure.
just because someone is autistic or has any other condition doesn't necessarily mean they need accommodation. It depend on their needs