rutgers1
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Apr 25, 2008
- Messages
- 1,496
We started our trip at BCV, moved to BWV, and will close things out at OKW. We have been at OK since Saturday. So far, we like it a lot.
THE GOOD:
1) The resort overall is pretty. I consider it to be the love child between POR and SSR.....even though it predates the latter (maybe both, not sure).
2) I like the vibe around the pool. The kids enjoy the slide, which is deceptive in that it looks short but actually lasts approximately 13 seconds. With the river meandering nearby, once again this reminds me of POR. I like the Gurgling Suitcase (bar), which is a few feet away. A quick service window (with mug refill station) is also right there. All in all, everything you could want is feet away from the pool. You could even do your laundry at machines while you swim, as they are also right there.
3) We are in a studio, and I like that there are two double beds (queen? not sure...but big enough).
4) We have had better luck getting buses from the parks to here than when we were at BWV and BCV. BWV was the worst.
5) We rented a car for this portion of the trip, and it is nice having the car right outside our building.
6) Our building, #14, is right near the action. We are a quick walk to two bus stops (one is the first one in, one is the last one out), plus we are right near the food/entertainment/pool.
7) This resort has the best wifi internet coverage of the three that we have stayed at this trip.
THE SO-SO:
1) Life is great if your building is near the front gate/hospitality house. If you are in one of the remote buildings, you have a pretty long journey if you are hungry or want to swim in the feature pool. We measured it last night, and the furthest corners of the resort are 6/10 of a mile from the hospitality house. I don't mind walking, I never want to stay in a resort where I have to walk that far to hit the main restaurant. Deal breaker.
2) The inside of our room is a bit worn/dated. I thought that I heard that they renovated this resort, but our room wasn't updated as far as I can tell. With that said, I wasn't blown away by our room at BCV or BWV either. It is fine, but not spectacular.
3) The bus and boat service are fine, but I admit that it was nice to walk to Epcot from BCV and BWV. We didn't walk to Hollywood Studios, but we have walked from BWV in the past.
THE EARLY VERDICT (still have a few more days)
I really like OKW. I think my assessment is highly based on the fact that building 14 is right across from the hospitality house. If we were stuck in one of the outer buildings, I think my review would conclude on a negative fashion.
This got me thinking about SSR and how we haven't been fans in the past. Perhaps our rating of SSR would have been different had we stayed in the Springs section and had quick access to the main feature pool and restaurant.
I have said this in the past, and I still believe it to the be the case. Many (most?) DVC members would be happy in a shack if that shack was located on the monorail line. The further you get from a resort, the more that a resort has to have in order to keep the guests happy. With that said, I fall into that same trap, as I prefer BCV and BWV first and foremost for their location --- right near two parks. Yes, BCV has an awesome pool that totally exceeded our expectations, but I wouldn't have been as excited about that portion of our trip if I had to walk 6/10 of a mile to reach the pool.
THE GOOD:
1) The resort overall is pretty. I consider it to be the love child between POR and SSR.....even though it predates the latter (maybe both, not sure).
2) I like the vibe around the pool. The kids enjoy the slide, which is deceptive in that it looks short but actually lasts approximately 13 seconds. With the river meandering nearby, once again this reminds me of POR. I like the Gurgling Suitcase (bar), which is a few feet away. A quick service window (with mug refill station) is also right there. All in all, everything you could want is feet away from the pool. You could even do your laundry at machines while you swim, as they are also right there.
3) We are in a studio, and I like that there are two double beds (queen? not sure...but big enough).
4) We have had better luck getting buses from the parks to here than when we were at BWV and BCV. BWV was the worst.
5) We rented a car for this portion of the trip, and it is nice having the car right outside our building.
6) Our building, #14, is right near the action. We are a quick walk to two bus stops (one is the first one in, one is the last one out), plus we are right near the food/entertainment/pool.
7) This resort has the best wifi internet coverage of the three that we have stayed at this trip.
THE SO-SO:
1) Life is great if your building is near the front gate/hospitality house. If you are in one of the remote buildings, you have a pretty long journey if you are hungry or want to swim in the feature pool. We measured it last night, and the furthest corners of the resort are 6/10 of a mile from the hospitality house. I don't mind walking, I never want to stay in a resort where I have to walk that far to hit the main restaurant. Deal breaker.
2) The inside of our room is a bit worn/dated. I thought that I heard that they renovated this resort, but our room wasn't updated as far as I can tell. With that said, I wasn't blown away by our room at BCV or BWV either. It is fine, but not spectacular.
3) The bus and boat service are fine, but I admit that it was nice to walk to Epcot from BCV and BWV. We didn't walk to Hollywood Studios, but we have walked from BWV in the past.
THE EARLY VERDICT (still have a few more days)
I really like OKW. I think my assessment is highly based on the fact that building 14 is right across from the hospitality house. If we were stuck in one of the outer buildings, I think my review would conclude on a negative fashion.
This got me thinking about SSR and how we haven't been fans in the past. Perhaps our rating of SSR would have been different had we stayed in the Springs section and had quick access to the main feature pool and restaurant.
I have said this in the past, and I still believe it to the be the case. Many (most?) DVC members would be happy in a shack if that shack was located on the monorail line. The further you get from a resort, the more that a resort has to have in order to keep the guests happy. With that said, I fall into that same trap, as I prefer BCV and BWV first and foremost for their location --- right near two parks. Yes, BCV has an awesome pool that totally exceeded our expectations, but I wouldn't have been as excited about that portion of our trip if I had to walk 6/10 of a mile to reach the pool.


) DVC members don't care at all about being close to the monorail line and would much sooner have their car parked within a few feet of their villa and buses/boats to use when they feel like it! I've experienced the busy monorail in the evening and it was not nice at all. Neither was the wait I've experienced at BWV to go to parks other than HS and Epcot. Think lots of us also prefer the smaller pools so don't have the need to walk too far. Happy that not everyone values the same things.


Seriously?