Interesting stuff here. I'm especially appreciative of the comments provided by @Tonka's Skipper and @truck1. Question: Was there a pilot on board?
... Question: Was there a pilot on board?
It will buff out![]()
This is where I got my info but of course it can always be incorrect. It shows the Infinity using 3 consistently and I think I read the NCL ship had just left and they show to be in 3 as well.
Hope wherever it is, others aren't impacted!
Heather
http://claalaska.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/Ketchikan-KTN-2016.pdf
Interesting stuff here. I'm especially appreciative of the comments provided by @Tonka's Skipper and @truck1. Question: Was there a pilot on board?
Close up of damage to the ship
![]()
Well there is the proof. There was indeed a gash, 12" X 10" and set in a max of 5", over a 6' X 6' area of the hull plating. Note the gray coating transfer from the dock. The bogger was indeed correct there was a gash. They must have gotten class to fly up or sent the photos and he approved a temporary patch from the inside. That horizontal gouge in the plating is where the hull hit a sharp corner of the dock at some point. Likely the first impact point.
Class would have approved the requirements for the repairs and the CG would have then signed off on them.
jbd, I stand corrected, I am amazed they let her sail with that kind of gash. This is why I never say never!
AKK
I'm kinda of surprised but not at the same time. What may have happened is the senior engineer from Celebrity prob looked at the hole from video or pictures real time, and said put a temp patch by doing this this this and this, wrote it up, CG agreed and class prob agreed until perm repairs can be made. From the picture it doesn't look like anything major behind it like a engine room (too high) or support area, and it looks between frames, so they may have gotten lucky with "cosmetic" damage as opposed to structural.
Morning!
I am afraid your wrong on that Truck. The vessel would not move from the port until Class approved any temporary repairs. Not if they want to keep their insurance and their class, safe ship and Hull certificates. The CG would not give them clearance to sail until approved by class. Once class signs off on the repairs, only then would the CG issue the clearance to sail. The CG would never stick their necks out and let the ship sail without class approval.
I am not 100% on this ,but I would guess that is a frame or vertical web in the middle of the gash, severely distorted and bent
AKK
What I was saying was that the senior engineer proposed the fix, sent it to class and the CG. Not that they just fixed and said whatever. They said we can do this and this, and the CG and class signed off on the fix before they did it. To me it almost looks like where 2 plates meet.
As truck 1 said .......yes......
However
1. The Master is always in command of his vessel except in the Panama and Suez canals. Except for those two places, the Master is always in Command and is responsible for his vessel.
2, The MASTER can, but is not required to give the command of the vessel navigation and maneuvering to a pilot, but the Master is still in command. The Pilot is there to offer assistance to the Master and provide detailed expert knowledge of the local waters.
3.Involving a Marine casualty or accident the Master is always responsible of his vessel. The Pilot can also be held liable for his actions or mistakes, but the bottom line is still the Master.
AKK
The Infinity made it to Vancouver this morning with the flesh wound. Repairs are underway..... great savings with the depressed currency.
OK.close enough. After the class got the photos to class, the class and the chief and the port engineering staff would have a phone meeting and work out what class would allow the chief/owners to do and what class would require. After the chief and the would then send the class requirements for the repairs.
I am amazed class and the CG let them sail with this amount/type of damage. Usually a temporary repair would in involve a overlaying of a fitted plate, then welded tightly welded to the hull. 2 days work and that fit the certified materials were readily available. This must have some type of inner repair.
I wish we could more details.......I do not see a hull plate joint in the photo. In theopen gash I see the frame severely bent/distorted and the point where the frame was welded to the hull plating has been pulled/torn away.
She is a Lloyd Registry vessel, built in 2001, registered in Malta.