I don't agree with Sarah Palin's political views, but I think it's sad the way this engagement has become yet another excuse to mock, insult, and ridicule her.
I wish Bristol and Levi the very best of luck. It won't be easy.
Nope, you are so wrong.
The boards have been full of people saying that Mel Gibson is a moron. Or John or Kate, or Michael Jackson or John Edwards or Al Gore. Are you offended by that too? Should those people also say, "although I don't agree with Mel, Kate, John, Michael,John or Al personally...." Or is it ok when the person's celebrity is connected to anything but politics?
You obviously are a huge fan of hers. I am not.
And I would suggest that you are venturing into the realm of personal attacks. Express your support for your famous person, but don't go attacking those that don't share the same view and asserting baseless accusations on their part.![]()
To me, adding that last line makes the statement a whole lot harsher. I didn't think it was too bad before that last line was added.
You can interpret the statement as a snarky insinuation that at least one of the parents is currently not a loving parent, and she is praying that they mature into one.
It is all where you put the emphasis and interpretation when you read it.
![]()
Personal attack? Really? Wow! I didn't see it that way.
Thought it was you two were just disagreeing. I thought personal attacks were insults or being sarcastic...and stuff like that.
No, it wasn't. It was plainly obvious that it was an opportunity to take a shot at a political figure. Otherwise, it could have read "Although I don't agree with her personally, She doesn't deserve..." or even just "She doesn't deserve...". We don't care what you think about her.
She could have. It is all in how you read the statement and where the reader puts the emphasis.Or she could have said that because not too long ago Levi wasn't in the baby's life according to Bristol herself.
"Within the next four to six weeks Palin's PR people will be releasing news that Bristol and Levi have signed on to 'star' in a new reality show. All about young parenting. And yes, they will also work up to a wedding," Gawker reported, quoting a commenter on an Alaskan anti-Palin blog who called himself "Levinews."
Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/gossip/2...rprise_engagement_announce.html#ixzz0thpOLTHW
Why OF COURSE they'll be doing a reality show.
I also wish that Mrs. Palin will be kind enough to make sure a really good Pre-Nup is drafted which protects her daughter, her grandson, and their privacy in the event of a divorce.![]()
What's next: Jon & Kate, Together Again?![]()
I just saw this on the news and them on the cover of US Weekly, and all I care to add is that baby, Tripp is absolutely BEAUTIFUL.![]()
Levi is pretty familiar with the media, so should be pretty savvy on how this would go.
The kids being media *****s isn't so bad. But that little dig that they just had to put out there, that they hadn't told the parents yet, rather nasty and immature of the kids I think. They went out of their way to publicly embarrass Palin. So, I will say it again, as much as I think she is an idiot, she did not deserve that kind of treatment from her daughter. She has always been publicly supportive of Bristol even though it went against her public values. I would think the kids would be publicly supportive and respectful of her too.
I really don't get this Abstinence-only sex education business it is a fact that from the begginning of time teenagers have been having sex. In the past teenagers where married by the time they wher 12 and already becoming parents (Henry VII's mother was only 13 when she had her only child). Now even 19 year olds are considered children instead of what they are young adults, we now treat them like children who are not even considered with enough respect to have their own post without parents believing they have the right to open their ofsprings mail, and yet these young people are supposed to respect their parents respect is a two way path my sister has 3 16 year olds and has never opened their mail or read their text messages and they trust her to tell her everything. I do hope these young adults have a good marriage but Sarah Palin really needs to get over the idea that she has the right to get into other people's bedrooms and tell them what to do because from what I have seen these taught Abstinence-only tend not to use birth control and that is dangerous.
I guess you do not have a 19yodd? I do. Wait until your nieces are older before you go off on a tangent preaching how wonderful they are.
You really need to get off the mail thing. My dd could care less if we open her mail. You do realize some families are close and work together, right? We are not petty like that and don't understand people that actually give a crap about someone opening their mail. It boogles my mind that this is an issue for you. How is that for the flipside?
As far as teens and sex, people are free to preach what they want and they do, esp. parents. Now whether anyone listens is another matter.![]()
Not to beat a dead horse, but I agree about that whole mail thing. I would've been seriously peeved if my mom ever opened my mail. She may have had her issues, but my mom was never snoopy like that or so mistrustful of my judgment or ability to handle my own business. It boggle my mind that parents would do such a thing.
Now, back to the business at hand...no mention of a reality show today on the Today Show. Has anyone heard any more on that front?
Well in my family we don't care. You do understand that some families do not care about that stuff, right?