disneyfans95
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Mar 29, 2010
- Messages
- 754
If it is not for a medical reason, then it is all about vanity
If it is not for a medical reason, then it is all about vanity
Ummm... actually, if you are getting breast implants, period, it is all about self image, always There is no medical necessity for breast implants, ever. They are cosmetic.
Ummm... actually, if you are getting breast implants, period, it is all about self image, always There is no medical necessity for breast implants, ever. They are cosmetic.
Ummm. Really, tell that to the woman i work with who lost one of her breasts to mastectomy, then had an implant. To her it was a necessity.
And to my mind my wanting to have reduction surgery is also cosmetic and definitely not a necessity, though, unlike most having an augmentation I can probably come up with enough excuses to get it covered by my insurance. But truthfully, it is about vanity - it's about my wanting to be able to have clothes that fit and not have the world judge me by my b**bs and, because I'm tired of having spots on my chest where they've brushed into stuff, and, and, and... Would you slam me?
No way! Please read the whole thread...I have implants. I wouldn't slam anyone, for any reason. I have them and I love them and I wish my insurance would cover them! I am saying that you should do what makes you feel best, free of judgment. So many on here have been quick to judge women who have implants as being vain or insecure.
My point was that people come on here saying it's vain or insecure for women who have lost breast tissue due to pregnancy, or nursing, or who are just not happy with their appearance, to have implants but say it's okay for women who have had mastectomies to be insecure about their appearance. I am just saying that if you are in the camp of "be happy with what you are given" then I don't see the distinction. I am decidedly NOT in that camp. My point was that NO implants are MEDICALLY necessary. They serve no medical purpose. Again, remember I have them. They are for appearance's sake regardless of the reason you get them. If, heaven forbid, I had to have a mastectomy would I consider implants necessary for me? .... 100%, absolutely, without a doubt. I also agree that insurance should cover it. Again, I have implants for purely cosmetic reasons.
Yet you compare a mastectomeis to a plain old b$$b job by saying there is no medical reason for them..
My Mother has always been petite and unfortuantely she allowed me and my brother to nurse her to death....
She did this in 1968 and 1970...when breast feeding was taboo. Anywho, fast forward to 1985 and she had a bilateral breast augmentation. She used a very good plastic surgeon in our area and of course had silicone implants at the time---right before all of the hellabaloo came out about silicone. She is still perfectly happy with the results. She is a gorgeous 66year old. They did harden or incapsulate after several years and when she went back to see him he tried to manually "crack" or loosen the hardness. It was too painful so Mom has just kept them the way they are. They still look beautiful in her clothing and bathingsuits and really did an excellent job for her self esteem---which is the only reason why anyone should do this....for themselves.Can I hijack this thread a little and ask if anyone has anyone good bra recommendations for us A's that can't afford surgery? I'd love to find a good one that makes me look bigger and not like its all bra.
Very sexy with gel curve by Victoria's Secret. They also have the "miraculous" bra, but it is super padded.
The gel has a really natural look - not at all like a "padded bra". Fits great and gives nice cleavage if you are looking for that
Seriously, I have like 5 of them.I second this as a fairly flat-chested person.The gel has a really natural look - not at all like a "padded bra". Fits great and gives nice cleavage if you are looking for that
Seriously, I have like 5 of them.