Omg,
@roseaster I love that comic you put up!

Totally needed that laugh, esp. after reading through this thread.
Do we have to have a preschool discussion about BLM vs. ALM? I'm talking about the words. Not the people behind the movement, not the hate behind attacks on the movement. Just the words. Black Lives Matter. Please show me where in that 3 word statement it says whites, asians, hispanics etc. do not matter. Those who are rebutting with All Lives Matter are choosing to assume exclusion. Instead of listening to the worries and concerns of those affected, they are responding with 'what about us?' Is this a popularity contest to figure out who is more oppressed? BLM is asking for inclusion, to be included in justice. Can we revisit how this country was built on bloodshed of slaves? I know, no one wants to talk about that cause they're tired of focusing on the past. How can we move on if we haven't learned from our past? The very fact we have BLM is proof we haven't learned. Violence/destruction during protesting is not productive, but how can we vilify those who are using that same tactic that has awarded us this country? Yes we have come a long way, but we still have much to learn; silencing those who are crying out is causing the violent outbursts during protesting. We need to focus on the message of systemic racism, which is the heart of the issue. Now, for those who feel there's no such thing; congratulations, you are apart of the problem and therefore have no voice in this conversation for change. You don't get to tell someone how they should feel about the injustice you don't even acknowledge or have ever experienced. No constructive convo is going to be had by people with that viewpoint.