I never said to make it a good SAP resort. Not even close. Just saying they should probably have made it just barely the worst SAP WDW resort, instead of
by far the worst SAP WDW resort.
With the current
point charts even shortening their trip they really couldn't even easily swap into a 1BR let alone a 2BR! So they don't even really have the option to begin with for 6 people.
If the total upfront cost for the points was the same, and the maintenance fees for the same stay are identical, then no a low
point chart and high maintenance fees are
not better. It would be the exact same if the total was the same. This setup makes it worse for trading out and better for trading in. Maybe by design, IDK.
But the options to trade out would be better with a slightly higher point chart and slightly lower MFs. Even if they were still the highest in WDW.
Ex.
If you have a contract stating that each day you get a cheeseburger for $2 prep fee and $1 service fee, and even if you love cheeseburgers, if there is a different contract that says for a $1 prep fee and $2 service fee you can get a cheeseburger AND an option to swap for a slice of pizza, or a sandwich, etc. then the second contract is objectively better.
Then I would argue the second option is better because the total costs the same and it is more flexible. You are arguing the opposite because you really like cheeseburgers... when both options still allow for a cheeseburger 100% of the time for the same cost.