hokiefan33
Disney Freak
- Joined
- May 21, 2004
- Messages
- 729
How exactly does that prove your point?JPN4265 said:![]()
Thank you so much for proving my point. This is the best example of why organized religion is so dangerous.![]()
How exactly does that prove your point?JPN4265 said:![]()
Thank you so much for proving my point. This is the best example of why organized religion is so dangerous.![]()
kdibattista said:I have a question for those who believe in God but not the Church. I guess this is more for the "non practicing Catholics" because I am not familiar with other religious practices (although please chime in if this applies to you). Anyway, if you do not go to Church, do you (or your children) participate in the Sacraments of Baptism, Holy Communion, Confirmation and were you wed in the Church?
The reason I ask is because that is something I struggled with for quite awhile myself.
The problem is, most all Churches DO have expectations and requirements... NO DOUBT ABOUT IT.Buckalew11 said:When I speak of commitments and accountability, I am certainly not saying that my church requires anything.
So, as a Christian, I am committed to teach classes, or to be enrolled in classes??? I have to VERY STRONGLY DISAGREE.Buckalew11 said:However, I do think there is commitment involved. Commitment to be in a class or lead a class. We are taught in the Bible to hold each other accountable.
And, just what does a general 'accountability to other fellow human beings' have to do with 'Church'????? I see no link here whatsoever. My accountability to those around me has no bearing on a requirement to join a church and to be committed to a specific church.Buckalew11 said:My commitment is to God. But through that commitment comes some commitment to others.
I am accountable to others, IMO, accountable to Christians and non-Christians alike.
Very True! And, we, as Christian's are NOT called to judge others. This is very very plainly forbidden. Many churches and Christians are not just spreading the good word, they are defining and judging 'sin'. This is a HUGE problem with organized religion.Buckalew11 said:While I agree that only God will judge me, in the meantime many, many people (Christian or not, on this board or in RL) will also be judging me. That really won't/doesn't matter as God is the real Judge but still, there's a lot of judging in this world.
JPN4265 said:![]()
Thank you so much for proving my point. This is the best example of why organized religion is so dangerous.![]()
Is there a reason you think they shouldn't have them? Does God have expectations of us, requirements of Christians? I believe He does, definitely. I'm not saying ALL demands of the church are God's demands - hopefully they are, but probably not always. However, we are clearly commanded to be using our spiritual gifts that God gives us (and He gives everyone AT LEAST 1, sometimes more), and what better place to be using them than serving Him in church?Wishing on a star said:The problem is, most all Churches DO have expectations and requirements... NO DOUBT ABOUT IT.
So why do you disagree with that, out of curiosity? One of the many ways we learn more about God and the application of His Word to our lives is through study, not just by ourselves but also in a group of believers, such as Sunday School, Bible study, discipleship classes, etc... Not everyone is called to teach, that is true, but we are all called to learn more. Why so adamant that you shouldn't be in any classes?Wishing on a star said:So, as a Christian, I am committed to teach classes, or to be enrolled in classes??? I have to VERY STRONGLY DISAGREE
Why the problem with accountability? This is clearly spoken of in Scripture. We, as fellow Christians are supposed to hold each other accountable, help each other stay on track and love and support each other. If you're not part of a group, how are you supposed to do this?Wishing on a star said:And, just what does a general 'accountability to other fellow human beings' have to do with 'Church'????? No link here whatsoever.
The Bible does contain this particular verse you're quoting, that is true. But it is not used in the context in which you are using it, I don't think. The original word used to oppose God is "mammon", not man. "Mammon", as defined in this context (meaning in opposition to God, as can be seen by what is being talked about) is better translated over as "treasure" or "riches", when talking about being personified and opposed to God. So when it says you cannot serve both God and mammon, it doesn't mean that if you serve God you can't serve men. That is neither the intended nor the implied meaning. It means you can't be sold out to God, but still desire the things of this earth, what we typically place value on, b/c God places no value on them at all. It's a different meaning entirely than saying you can't serve, or shouldn't serve, men. If that were the case, does that mean that anyone with a job that reports to a supervisor should quit if they're a Christian? Obviously not.Wishing on a star said:As far as God and Spiritually. This is a very important choice. The Bible says that You can NOT serve ( be committed to, or, be accountable to) God and Man.
A lot here depends on your definition of "accountable." Scripture clearly holds that we are to hold each other accountable. Doesn't mean we are the final judge, but does mean that we are to help each other along in love.Wishing on a star said:I am not accountable to any man, or any church.... Only God.
Hmmm...if this is the case, how exactly do you explain 1 Corinthians 5:12-13 What business is it of mine to judge those outside the church? Are you not to judge those inside? God will judge those outside. "Expel the wicked man from among you." That, to me, is not plainly forbidden. You have to define the word "judge" very carefully, and a lot of times, in the context it's written in, it doesn't mean what most people think it means.Wishing on a star said:And, we, as Christian's are NOT called to judge others. This is very very plainly forbidden. They are not spreading the word, they are defining and judging 'sin'.
Wishing on a star said:Cardaway,
Ummm, the whole premise of this thread is to ask about Christians who are not church-goers. So, these thoughts/examples are exactly what are being discussed here.
If you do not consider yourself a Christian, then I hope you will kindly refrain from hijacking this thread.
Wishing on a star said:Buckalew,
Please do forgive me for answering your post like this. I truly do respect you as a Christian! I am happy that you are comfortable in your church and your commitments! And, I mean no personal offense at all to you! Please realize that no offense is intended! I simply felt compelled to answer, in the spirit of an open intelligent conversation.
The problem is, most all Churches DO have expectations and requirements... NO DOUBT ABOUT IT.
So, as a Christian, I am committed to teach classes, or to be enrolled in classes??? I have to VERY STRONGLY DISAGREE.
And, just what does a general 'accountability to other fellow human beings' have to do with 'Church'????? I see no link here whatsoever. My accountability to those around me has no bearing on a requirement to join a church and to be committed to a specific church.
As far as God and Spirituality. This is actually a very important choice. The Bible says that You can NOT serve ( be committed to, or, be accountable to) God and Man.
I am not accountable to any man, or any church.... Only God.
Very True! And, we, as Christian's are NOT called to judge others. This is very very plainly forbidden. Many churches and Christians are not just spreading the good word, they are defining and judging 'sin'. This is a HUGE problem with organized religion.
Yes, it is very true that everybody holds their own opinions... And comes to their own judgments... However, when it comes to spirituality and sin, it seems to be the churches, and the people associated with the churches, who seem to be making the judgments regarding sin and salvation. This is forbidden. Christ said "Let he who is without sin throw the first stone".
So, actually, your comments have just nailed home my point about most churches. These views are the very views that I, and many others, have a real problem with.
We can "agree to disagree", that is certainly fine. However, that scripture is NOT saying, in its context, to expel only the "wicked"; that is actually just a quotation from Deuteronomy in the OT. It clearly asks the rhetorical question "Are we not to judge those within?", to which the obvious answer, in this context, to that rhetorical question is "Yes!" What the whole little passage means is that don't get caught up with trying to disassociate yourself or have nothing at all to do with the world (those outside the church), b/c if you did, you wouldn't be able to associate with anyone. But that we can't hold those in the church to that same lesser standard, therefore some judgment is necessary (as shown by the rhetorical question) to ensure that that kind of mediocrity doesn't occur in the church. Remember, the word "judge" is not always what most people think it means, in scriptural context. There's a difference between "condemnation" and "inspection." We clearly have the right, AND the obligation, to do so.Wishing on a star said:Hokie,
I could say nothing at all to sway your views.... I will not even try!![]()
I will say that I see these issues from an entirely different viewpoint.
To use a scripture saying that it is Okay to expel an obviosly 'WICKED' person (NOTE: not sinful but 'wicked') if necessary to condone accountability to the men in a church...![]()
I think the whole point if that scripture was "Let GOD do the 'judging". NOT that we have any obligation to 'judge' or to participate in church.
We will have to agree to disagree.
Wishing on a star said:Cardaway,
I didn't mean to tell you what you could post! If you feel that you are in the same situation as others on this thread, then that is a valid viewpoint!
I simply wanted to caution against hijacking or side-tracking! I was hoping to clarify the topic, and hoping to keep the thread on-topic.![]()
I don't dispute that many on here have concerns with organized religion, but I do dispute the validity of those concerns. If you look at a lot of the concerns, what do you see? "I think others in the church are hypocritical, therefore I don't go." "I don't think you need to go. It's between me and God." "I don't hold to many of my church's beliefs, and I can't find one that suits me, therefore I don't go."Wishing on a star said:We will agree to disagree on a few points. But, I think that it is sad but true that many of us who are not attending church at this time have valid concerns with organized religion.
Sorry, but I found this post very rude. Cardaway said nothing that deserved this reply.Wishing on a star said:Cardaway,
Ummm, the whole premise of this thread is to ask about Christians who are not church-goers. So, these thoughts/examples are exactly what are being discussed here.
If you do not consider yourself a Christian, then I hope you will kindly refrain from hijacking this thread.
Wishing on a star said:Hokiefan,
I am trying to see what you are saying.
However, I do continue to feel as I do about these issues.
You mention the term 'inspection'.
I immediately think of the Scripture, "How can you see to remove the splinter in your brothers eye when you have a log in your own eye."
With that, I feel that I have expressed my thoughts on the overall topic here. And, I am logging off here anyway. I think I will step back and see what any other posters have to say.
Exactly. Matthew talks of the MANNER in which we do it, not the fact of whether to do it or not. 1 Corinthians clearly calls us to DO it.2funny2c said:That verse speaks to HOW we judge and correct others. It doesnt say we shouldnt. It speaks of correcting and judging others of a sin that you your self struggle with. Basically dont be a hypocrite. Repent of your sin before you address others.
Again, it is how we judge that we will be held accountable for in the end. We should do so in love.
jimmiej said:Here is a scripture pertinent to being a part of a group (in this case a local church body):
Ecclesiastes 4
9 Two are better than one,
because they have a good return for their work:
10 If one falls down,
his friend can help him up.
But pity the man who falls
and has no one to help him up!
11 Also, if two lie down together, they will keep warm.
But how can one keep warm alone?
12 Though one may be overpowered,
two can defend themselves.
A cord of three strands is not quickly broken.
If you serve the Lord alone, what happens when you're attacked by Satan (i.e., a sin enters your life or you are tempted)? Who's going to be there to hold you accountable, to give you a helping hand?
Just a suggestion: Those of you who've had enough of "organized" religion, have you considered starting a small group of like-minded believers & meeting in each other's homes? After all, this is how the first local church started.