
I could kick their butt. I really don't feel any safer because Grampy ran a stick thru my bag...Laugh O. Grams said:In a world where our current Administration refuses to spend more money on protecting our ports, and fights, do to close ties with the NRA, to keep guns flowing freely, even to those on terrorist watch lists, I appreciate that WDW is at least doing a little something to protect their guests, even if it is to cover their own butts!
: I am an NRA member and gun owner. I have purchased guns in the past year. I know the background checks needed to purchase a gun legally. They are enough to stop a prohibited person from buying a gun legally. This will not stop a criminal from buying a gun. Even if a person is on a Watch List doesn't mean they are a terrorist. This also should not prohibit them from buying a gun if they can do it legally.
No flames...back at you!reeeoga said:This is my opinion and not a flame: I am an NRA member and gun owner. I have purchased guns in the past year. I know the background checks needed to purchase a gun legally. They are enough to stop a prohibited person from buying a gun legally. This will not stop a criminal from buying a gun. Even if a person is on a Watch List doesn't mean they are a terrorist. This also should not prohibit them from buying a gun if they can do it legally.
I also own a handgun, so I am not against the gun industry, or against law abiding citizens to own them. There are hundreds of thousands of gun owners, like me, who feel the NRA is a bit too extreme for our tastes. What I am against are the special interest groups, like the NRA, that fight some of the common sense legislation for gun ownership. If you're on a terrorist watchlist, the gov, through the Patriot Act, has easier access to bug your telephones and all personal records, including, as I'm sure you know, what books you check out of the library. They can basically stomp all your rights to privacy. But heaven forbid we don't allow the same person on a terrorist watch list to buy a gun!! Just an opinion. I do agree that our borders need to be monitored better as well. The list is so long, I just wish they'd do more than making me take my belt off when boarding a plane! Start anywhere, I don't care!!
. The tech would detect "bad stuff" without being intrusive.
reeeoga said:Do you think the bag search going into the parks helps with security? Does it make you safe?
reeeoga said:I also want profilling. Yes even based on race. The Israilies do it on their airlines, they have not have a hijacking in over 30 years. It makes no sense to search a little old black ladies purse if no little old black lady has every bombed anything. That might offend people, sorry but that is how I feel.![]()
I hear you. And I couldn't agree more. I've always heard a saying (really based in medicine but...) "If you hear hoof beats...think horse, not zebra". Profilling only makes sense. I will now go back to sidelines to don my fire proof suit. 
This is where you completely lose me. Profiling is ineffective with the problem we're dealing with here. We have the Al-Qaeda group, we know they're in 40 countries, from Malaysia to the Philippines to Latin America, so Arab looking people won't satisfy.reeeoga said:I also want profilling. Yes even based on race. The Israilies do it on their airlines, they have not have a hijacking in over 30 years. It makes no sense to search a little old black ladies purse if no little old black lady has every bombed anything. That might offend people, sorry but that is how I feel.![]()
--------------palmtreegirl said:No and no. I'd feel perfectly safe if they discontinued the bag searches. The best kind of security is the kind you don't see and Disney already has plenty of that already.