bankr63
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2010
- Messages
- 3,565
I think that one option to make the best of online learning is community schooling.I am so torn on this. A few weeks ago, when Ottawa daily cases were super low, I was all for sending my kids back. DH is going to grade 7, and is not AT ALL motivated with the online learning. It was a major struggle every day. He does game online with his friends, and mentally seems to be doing okay with the separation. Meanwhile, DD, going to grade 5, did pretty well with the online learning, but her mental health is greatly suffering from being separated from her peers. Anxiety, insomnia, general meltdowns over little things - she is a social creature, and this is harming her in ways we may not understand for years.
When they sent out a survey a couple of weeks ago if we were planning to keep the kids home if online was an option, I said no. But as cases rise again in the Ottawa area, I just don't know anymore.
There are no good options for our kids right now.
I don't think hundreds of students in a single building is a viable plan UNLESS the governments are willing to adjust to be safe and fund the required changes (no sign of that yet). Even then, outbreaks will happen.
What mostly failed in online education last year was motivation as well as problems with access. In Ontario, Ford's announcement at the very beginning that everyone gets an automatic pass was the biggest disincentive to giving effort I have ever heard. One of the dumbest things a politician ever said; and it was true, teachers were not allowed to evaluate any work that occurred after March 13, UNLESS it actually helped the student's mark. So free pass everybody!
So community schooling could solve a couple of issues; I am thinking like the one room schoolhouse. Small cohorts of students from a limited area would attend school at one neighbor's house (all grades together) allowing for social interaction with a small cohort of friends. That neighbor could be compensated by the government to oversee the children's education. Proper access to internet and devices would have to provided (also government subsidized); that is one of the biggest issues that many families faced - five kids and one laptop trying to share access and attend sessions at one time. The parent who takes on this role is intended to be a proctor/assistant, ensuring that students are putting in the effort; the teachers would still create the content. the proctor would ensure that students who need help with topics are actually reaching out to the professional teachers and would enable these interactions. This would also help with the unemployment problem for folks (like me) who are unable to find work during the COVID crisis.
This idea occurs to me because I live on a street with a "gang of 8". Kids from two families who have been a social circle since this was allowed (and probably a bit before as they struggled with social distancing when it was required). Having one parent oversee their education as a JOB would cost no more than the $2000/mo they are currently getting from government sources and would greatly enhance the economic recovery by allowing several other parents who still have jobs to concentrate on work, or actually go to work, during school hours. More people contributing, and contributing effectively.
If communities step up they can keep their young people healthy and educated and mentally stimulated while reducing the inherent risks that a large building filled with people presents.