I agree. I don't even ever have a drink on my lunch hour because I think it would look bad to go back to the office with martini breath (guess that 3 martini lunch is a lost tradition. . . )The other thing to consider is a paid worker, no matter what age, should not be "helping themselves" to anything without permission. And drinking on the job, any job, is never a good idea, nor appreciated by the employer.
My guess is the FIL isn't being paid for his time, and is doing it as a favor, therefore, it's certainly more permissable.
Here is a scenario I found on another board that I thought would make for an interesting Saturday discussion. To paraphrase:
So how would you feel in this situation?
Good point, I didn't think of that. If it's, say, a Coors Light, that shows grandpa's judgment isn't so good. Not sure if such a guy should be trusted....It depends, what kind of beer is it?
Not a problem... its a adult and 1 beer. The problem I would have it having my FIL drive 4 hours to watch my kid for 3 1/2 hours? Unless I read that wrong.
I was saying why would it be a problem if a teenager had had a beer under these same circumstances.
![]()
Is it? Not in every state. Let us think about the actual code from 1984.
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/uscode23/usc_sec_23_00000158----000-.html
As of January 1, 2007, only 14 states and the District of Columbia ban underage consumption outright, 19 states do not specifically ban underage consumption, and an additional 27 states have family member and/or location exceptions to their underage consumption laws.
http://t in y url.com/anorz (remove the spaces)
So depending on the state, in this scenario if a teen had drunk a beer in a private home, there would be no law broken.
I was saying why would it be a problem if a teenager had had a beer under these same circumstances.
![]()
Why?
Not in every state as has been previously posted. The law in 31 states does not prohibit consumption on private property by a minor.Because the drinkng age is 21, not teenage.