Don't we all want to do more for our kids than we had? I, too, came from a "poor" (in money; rich in love) family-of-origin, but wound up doing reasonably well for myself in the working world. I gave and give my DS absolutely everything I possibly can...and feel not the slightest nanosecond of guilt over it...
My DS, now 25, is an independent, highly successful "new lawyer" working crazy-insane hours in Manhattan. He's completely responsible, thoughtful & considerate. He's a genuinely nice guy. He's generous and steady-going. I'm so proud of him I could burst.
And I gave him absolutely everything I could!
Lots of trips to Disney. Whatever toys/games/electronics he wanted that I could afford. All the special trips (he did Chile and the Amazon Rain Forest on special trips w/his high school) I could manage that he was interested in doing, as well as regular trips to visit family 1000 miles away.
And I absolutely did NOT (and do not) worry about spoiling him. His work ethic is beyond belief. He has earned his early success. (And of course there are a lot of years in which he could continue to succeed, doing ever better; or "life" could rear up and bite him in the butt and he could suffer setbacks--we just have no idea)...
I would never have considered taking him to nat'l parks--I HATE camping and there's no possible way I'd put myself thru a camping trip just so I could say I took him to a nat'l park!
Bottom line: there are benefits and burdens to having plenty; there are benefits and burdens to having "just enough;" there are benefits and burdens to having too little. It's not only all in the values we teach our kids, it's also in the luck of the draw in terms of what kind of kids we get--it isn't all parental influence (important as parental influence is). Some of it is the inherent nature of the child him/herself!
I am hugely lucky with my child...he has his "issues," of course. He's not perfect (altho as viewed thru my VERY rose-colored lenses, he comes close!). But such indulgence as I could and did give him didn't hurt him in the slightest and it made ME VERY VERY happy.
If you can't use hard-earned "wealth" to give to your kids, why bother????
To each his own...
My DS, now 25, is an independent, highly successful "new lawyer" working crazy-insane hours in Manhattan. He's completely responsible, thoughtful & considerate. He's a genuinely nice guy. He's generous and steady-going. I'm so proud of him I could burst.
And I gave him absolutely everything I could!
Lots of trips to Disney. Whatever toys/games/electronics he wanted that I could afford. All the special trips (he did Chile and the Amazon Rain Forest on special trips w/his high school) I could manage that he was interested in doing, as well as regular trips to visit family 1000 miles away.
And I absolutely did NOT (and do not) worry about spoiling him. His work ethic is beyond belief. He has earned his early success. (And of course there are a lot of years in which he could continue to succeed, doing ever better; or "life" could rear up and bite him in the butt and he could suffer setbacks--we just have no idea)...
I would never have considered taking him to nat'l parks--I HATE camping and there's no possible way I'd put myself thru a camping trip just so I could say I took him to a nat'l park!
Bottom line: there are benefits and burdens to having plenty; there are benefits and burdens to having "just enough;" there are benefits and burdens to having too little. It's not only all in the values we teach our kids, it's also in the luck of the draw in terms of what kind of kids we get--it isn't all parental influence (important as parental influence is). Some of it is the inherent nature of the child him/herself!
I am hugely lucky with my child...he has his "issues," of course. He's not perfect (altho as viewed thru my VERY rose-colored lenses, he comes close!). But such indulgence as I could and did give him didn't hurt him in the slightest and it made ME VERY VERY happy.
If you can't use hard-earned "wealth" to give to your kids, why bother????
To each his own...