bcla
On our rugged Eastern foothills.....
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2012
- Messages
- 25,861
Unfortunate? That was intentionally provocative.
Unfortunate? That was intentionally provocative.
I will amend that to really stupid name then.Unfortunate? That was intentionally provocative.
Beyond meats may be good for those who are vegetarian or are unable to eat meat for some reason. However, if you are eating it to be "healthier" I stay away from it: https://www.mashed.com/192631/what-youre-really-eating-when-you-eat-a-beyond-burger/
I will amend that to really stupid name then.
^^ Good article. Most of these fad foods try to play up what they think people will find good about them. Coconut oil isn't a health food and that ingredient list above shows several other chemical additives. Many other supposedly 'healthy' foods play up the fact they don't contain additives you can't pronounce. It just depends on what is currently trendy that their marketing people try to take advantage of. Potato chips didn't suddenly become a health food just because 'plant based' is a trendy new marketing term.
Sounds like their newest pitch doesn't relate to health benefits but that it helps save the environment compared to the ways other animals are raised. Not sure if that will catch on with most consumers.
The first meal I ever ate at Red Robin was the fish, even though DH told me “you don’t get fish in a hamburger place”.It was always interesting going to Red Robin with a Hindu vegetarian. Not only was meat not on the table, but with a strenuous objection to beef. No objection to anyone else, but man that was odd. His only option was the veggie burger at the time, although I'm not sure exactly what it was. Might have been mostly black beans. I'm not even sure they reserved a part of the grill just for that. Even the Hindus I knew of that had no objection to chicken might have been upset if the grill was used for beef, or others like Muslims who might object if the same grill was used for bacon. I've worked with lots of people from different backgrounds, and finding places that would be fine for everyone could be tricky.
Burger King doesn't cook the Impossible Whopper on a separate setup except on request. They'll clean off an area to do that. Not sure about Red Robin. They claim they have vegetarian/vegan options, which sounds like a separate area, but I guess one should ask to make sure.
But people in India, home of 1.38 BILLION people, have already pretty much perfected the art of making non-meat taste mesmerizing by orchestrating carefully selected spices. They don't use weird chemicals or goop to make their meals palatable, it is delicious AND most live in poverty so they are artful in managing a lack of refrigeration, so it's not like the answer doesn't exist. I've also had Ethiopian and Middle Eastern food which manages quite nicely. Seems the big difference is having or not having dairy, which demands refrigeration and is more European, skip the dairy and it's a whole new game. No need for food alternatives,the whole movement is just bizarre which is fine for adults who opt in but if anyone tries forcing this on kids in poor communities I will be out there protesting in a heartbeat.Good quality vegetable protein is easily available, but who wants to live off a diet of vegan protein shakes or tofu? Food doesn't have to taste good to keep us alive, and more expensive food doesn't necessarily make us healthier. The primary reason we spend more money on food is in the hope that it's going to taste better. Spices and most flavorings are superfluous. And we specifically eat things that we know are unhealthy. This whole exercise with Beyond, Impossible, and others is all about making it palatable.
Then why bother with a Beyond/Impossible burger to begin with? They just prefer the taste over real meat?People aren’t going to fast food places for “real food” or their health anyway.