Ummm, GOP pretty much controls the Supreme Court, and fringe environmental groups are not sitting on a pile of cash, so this argument makes no sense.![]()
Yes, I do think gas prices being where they are, is a result of this administrations energy policy. I believe they had hoped to both profit and provide our country with cheap gas when they invaded Iraq. However once Iraq's pipelines where sabotaged, cheap gas was no longer part of our economic policy. But the oil companies were still able to benefit from the sharp rise in the price of oil, so all was good.
It would be interesting if Cheney's secret energy policy was made available to the public.
Where in the world would you get "information" like this?![]()
Not trying to interject politics in here, but remember that we're getting our "news" about the economy from a national media of whom the vast majority are actively campaigning for a certain presidential candidate. Their objective is to paint an entirely bleak picture to pave the way for their candidate to win. Moreover, the vast majority of "reporters" know as much about economics as they do about astrophysics. Consumer prices are rising because the cost of oil is rising, due to a huge increase in demand, mostly from China. Since everything we buy is trucked around the country, those fuel costs increase the costs of goods. Our political class has chosen not to drill for oil in this country, where we have vast reserves, making us dependent on foreign oil.
You guys really think our government has that much control over the price of oil? One of the huge issues is that the dollar is worth much less than in was, due to our spending ways (both Democrats and Republicans have been spend happy - just on different things). When the dollar is worth less, the cost of things from overseas goes up.
Here are some examples of how the environment is being damaged, (though not YET destroyed) and the reasons why we would not benefit economically from the drilling in ANWR:
Oil Drilling Is Harming Arctic Ecosystems
March 27, 2003 (Adapted by Victoria Schlesinger and Kathleen M. Wong, California Academy of Sciences) - Oil exploration has permanently
harmed the ecosystems of the Arctic, according to a new study. A blue-ribbon panel assembled by the National Academy of Sciences has shown that 30 years of roadbuilding, noise, and oil exploration has affected the behavior of animals, harmed vegetation, and caused erosion.
www.arcticrefugeaction.org/newsroom/myths-vs-facts.pdf
![]()
![]()
![]()
Some people will believe anything...They are going to report only what they want the rest of the world to know, whether it is based in fact or not.
This point and this point alone needs to be broadcast 24 hours a day on all of the networks. This price increase did not happen by chance. With the rest of the world seeing the direction of our Presidential campaign, get ready to be fleeced on a lot of things in the future. They smell weakness because it's clear there is no will to defend ourselves if the GOP isn't there anymore. Sure they aren't perfect, but the alternative will be disaster.
![]()
![]()
![]()
Some people will believe anything. Anyway, The question was concerning "oil drilling" and not "oil exploration" and why do you think any "blue ribbon panel" by any academy is gospel truth? They are going to report only what they want the rest of the world to know, whether it is based in fact or not.
Kathy OD, I agree.
But I think its still important that we try to get past the misinformation and try to make wise choices...even though it sometimes seems futile.
What I find disturbing is that lack of quality conversations on the issues that will most certainly impact our future. Attacking each other's views and failing to bring substantive arguments to the table only exacerbates the problem.
I'm not worried, but I do feel alot of people overextended themsleves without considering the later economic consequences of their actions. Lots of people charge up stuff on their cc's that they don't really "need" [honestly, we don't "need" cell phones, iPods, Coach bags, and LCD HD TVs, but the lower and middle classes are clamoring for these "luxury" items and more or less deeming them necessities]. People bought houses imagining a quick flip and tens of thousands in profit, rather than looking for a place to live in for the next 10 - 20 years. Women got breast augmentation and men got pec implants rather than save the money in an emergency fund. People will still pay $4 a day for a damn latte at Starbucks, $5 for a pack of smokes, and $12 for a 6-pack of beer then cry that they're poor. No one wants to take any personal responsibility for anything. Too bad, so sad, but times are not nearly as tough as some of these ridiculous sob stories would make you believe.
Woah, I guess we hang in different crowds.
Using your logic, that actually works both ways. Who is to determine which group of experts is better than another? Each side will present only what they want to get out.
Nothing more than PROPAGANDA....both sides of an argument use it equally in an effort to sway those who really don't have any real way of knowing.![]()
The same old Republican scare tactics. sheesh
I agree completely. They don't offer any proof to support their beliefs, and they discount supportable evidence as fabricated.
It's really a bizarre situation, isn't it?
.