JanaDee
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2013
- Messages
- 7,911
Because there are very few men that care about what brands their wife wears.Why does my gender play a roll in this?
Because there are very few men that care about what brands their wife wears.Why does my gender play a roll in this?
I surely would not equate LP to Valentino!!!I wasn't aware they sold LP at those stores, I've only seen it at boutiques or small independents. Def not implying LP is "high end" nor couture.
Target has done this before with other brands as stated and I feel it degrades the brand. Could you imagine a Valentino for Target?
To me, what you are really saying is you are buying it for the price/status.
As others have pointed out, Target has done collaboration with much higher end designers than Lilly Pulitzer , Zac Posen, Missoni, Alexander McQueen all have done the same type of lines with Target.
Those names are much more prestigious and higher end than Lilly Pulitzer.
The difference, in my opinion, is those other brands are much more high quality. That's wht some are all pissy. Nobody is mistaking a normal Alexander McQueen dress for a Target one.
It must suck to realize you are buying an over priced cotton blend dress and the riff raff that shops at Target (gasp, clutch pearls) is getting the same thing.
Oh the horror.
I surely would not equate LP to Valentino!!!![]()
From the link...I really like this woman's take on Lily Pulitzer
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...-be-good-for-retail-but-its-terrible-fashion/
Lilly Pulitzer is preppy. It is part of a preppy uniform that announces itself from fifty paces. It is not so much a declaration of wealth as it is a perceived statement about class, lineage and attitude. Anyone can work hard and save up enough cash to go out and purchase a Chanel suit or a Gucci handbag. A devoted student of Vogue can cobble together a personal style that speaks to its public identity. But Lilly Pulitzer suggests an advantage of birth. The clothes stir up scrapbook notions of ancient family trees, summer compounds, boarding school uniforms, and large, granite buildings inscribed with some great-great-grandfather’s name. Lilly Pulitzer represents something that money cannot buy.
I surely would not equate LP to Valentino!!!![]()
But when he "prostituted" his designs to Target Alexander McQueen's status didn't change, nor did the Target release "cheapen" his name. I don't think it does L.P. either.Not equating to, but since Alexander McQueen and others were mentioned...
From the link...
Yeah, not so much.![]()
Because there are very few men that care about what brands their wife wears.
Those others did do Target collaborations and it didn't hurt their brand.Not equating to, but since Alexander McQueen and others were mentioned...
I guess I'm unique. Lol
Ok...I know you are a guy...but most guys have NO clue who Alexander McQueen is!LOLNot equating to, but since Alexander McQueen and others were mentioned...
Last thing I want to do is spend more money than I need to to acquire what I want. See no status is spending money foolishly (subjective term).
My husband would probably think it was Steve's son.Ok...I know you are a guy...but most guys have NO clue who Alexander McQueen is!LOL
My husband would probably think it was Steve's son.