- Joined
- Apr 16, 2006
- Messages
- 9,585
I agree with OP in that AK is the least developed of the parks from an attraction perspective. I believe it's the Disney answer to Busch Gardens Tampa, from whom they hope to siphon the visitors who would leave WDW to check out what used to be the area's only "zoo that thinks it's a theme park."
That said, the Imagineers and artists have truly outdone themselves at AK. I've been in some really undeveloped areas around the world, and AK's themed areas -- like the african town and the tibetan village -- look and feel like the real thing.
So, like all the AK-philes, I agree that perhaps having fewer attractions is a GOOD thing. Get a cup of tea from the tea vendor, slow down, and take the time to actually LOOK at the details, 'cause in this park, they got the details right.
That said, the Imagineers and artists have truly outdone themselves at AK. I've been in some really undeveloped areas around the world, and AK's themed areas -- like the african town and the tibetan village -- look and feel like the real thing.
So, like all the AK-philes, I agree that perhaps having fewer attractions is a GOOD thing. Get a cup of tea from the tea vendor, slow down, and take the time to actually LOOK at the details, 'cause in this park, they got the details right.