I stand corrected specifically about the extra outlet scented oil fresheners. I see the recall of those types of plug-ins, which, thankfully, we don't use. Here is my source of info that is referring to those chain e-mails that are currently going around about Glade plug-ins in general. It's from urbanlegends.about.com. Still - "safety first" is certainly the best motto!
from urbanlegends.about.com
Comments: (UPDATED) Yet again, we are faced with a dire warning authored by a person who didn't see fit to sign his or her name to it. We have no way of determining, therefore, whether the incident described above actually took place.
As to the general question of whether Glade brand plug-in air fresheners constitute a particular fire hazard, all the available evidence indicates that is not the case.
Manufacturer maintains product is proven safe
S.C. Johnson, the manufacturer of Glade PlugIn brand air fresheners, notes that the devices it currently has on the market have been thoroughly tested and proven safe when used as directed. And, although the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission presided over a voluntary recall of 2.5 million "misassembled" Glade Extra Outlet Scented Oil Air Fresheners two years ago in April 2002 on grounds that they "could pose a risk of fire," the agency has issued no warnings on any make or model of plug-in air freshener since.
Anecdotal reports unfounded
As noted in a May 2002 article in the Milwaukee Business Journal, the Consumer Product Safety Commission also reported receiving "scores" of complaints about the devices up to that time and was collecting information on their safety. The agency found no cause for further action, however.
Some fire victims interviewed in TV news reports at the time of the 2002 recall blamed plug-in air fresheners for damage to their homes, but, although a similar product made by another company was named as the probable cause of one fire, no Glade PlugIns were determined to be at fault by investigators.
A class action lawsuit was filed in Illinois that same year alleging that a faulty Glade PlugIn had ignited, resulting in $200,000 damage to a Chicago home. The suit, contending that other consumers had suffered similar damages, accused S.C. Johnson of negligence in not warning the public that its products could overheat and cause fires. Ultimately, class action certification was denied by the presiding judge due to lack of merit, S.C. Johnson reports, and a modest settlement was reached in the case.
Independent tests show no product malfunction
An independent investigation conducted by Underwriters Laboratories, a nonprofit safety certification firm, found that none of the anecdotal reports of problems with plug-in air fresheners sold under the Glade brand could be duplicated in a laboratory setting, concluding that fires attributed to the products were most likely the result of faulty home wiring.