dismedvc
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2008
- Messages
- 715
As I understand it, if you are a member, even if you are only a part owner of a small contract, you get all the member perks every time you stay, even if you are staying on someone else’s points.
For existing owners, especially those who are planning on doing an add-on anyway, and who want their adult children and other relatives to be able to get the member perks and discounts, why not do a 25 point add-on. (I know that an add-on needs to be in the same names as the original owners, but once it is closed, you can re-title only the add-on with up to a total of 6 names). If you are just adding names without charging, I think this automatically passes ROFR. Any issues with the small number of points could be avoided by having the original owner transfer the points from this small contract up to the main contract each year, and from there they could be used or banked as needed. (That assumes the original owner would still be one of the up to 6 owners on the small contract, and does not need to "save" the one allowed transfer)
I have seen several posts about members wanting to add their children, mother, brother, sister, etc. to their membership so those people could get the member perks and discounts, especially the annual pass discount. However, most of the replies point out the risks if there are family problems, and the fact that everyone added would have full control to use or even sell the points. This avoids those problems and would be a relatively risk free way to add the people, since only a 25 point contract would be at risk.
Any thoughts? I would be especially interested in whether members think that even if this could be done under the “letter of the rules”, it is really against the DVC spirit.
P.S. Maybe a topic for a different post, (moderators feel free to pull or move this part) but what would stop a group of non-members who frequently stay a DVC resorts by renting points, from buying one very small resale contract and getting all the member benefits. Obviously they would need to use the points from their small contract before they expired, but they could still make the bulk of their stays on rented points. All the benefits of membership, but almost none of the commitment. What do you think of this?
For existing owners, especially those who are planning on doing an add-on anyway, and who want their adult children and other relatives to be able to get the member perks and discounts, why not do a 25 point add-on. (I know that an add-on needs to be in the same names as the original owners, but once it is closed, you can re-title only the add-on with up to a total of 6 names). If you are just adding names without charging, I think this automatically passes ROFR. Any issues with the small number of points could be avoided by having the original owner transfer the points from this small contract up to the main contract each year, and from there they could be used or banked as needed. (That assumes the original owner would still be one of the up to 6 owners on the small contract, and does not need to "save" the one allowed transfer)
I have seen several posts about members wanting to add their children, mother, brother, sister, etc. to their membership so those people could get the member perks and discounts, especially the annual pass discount. However, most of the replies point out the risks if there are family problems, and the fact that everyone added would have full control to use or even sell the points. This avoids those problems and would be a relatively risk free way to add the people, since only a 25 point contract would be at risk.
Any thoughts? I would be especially interested in whether members think that even if this could be done under the “letter of the rules”, it is really against the DVC spirit.
P.S. Maybe a topic for a different post, (moderators feel free to pull or move this part) but what would stop a group of non-members who frequently stay a DVC resorts by renting points, from buying one very small resale contract and getting all the member benefits. Obviously they would need to use the points from their small contract before they expired, but they could still make the bulk of their stays on rented points. All the benefits of membership, but almost none of the commitment. What do you think of this?