Just to keep this "Villains Park" in perspective, here's a link to the New Disney Parks page at wdwmagic.com:
http://www.wdwmagic.com/newpark.htm
Not much information there. But what is of interest is the piece that begins "With Disney's Animal Kingdom having just opened..." There is no date on the page, but the comment about DAK would have to put the timeframe of its posting somewhere in mid-1998. The Disney Villains concept is mentioned as one of four possibilities. So, rumors of the concept date back more than five years.
Physical construction on DAK took just about 3 years. So, unless there is an announcement forthcoming in the next few days, a new park will not be a reality before 2007.
Personally, I fail to see much incentive for them to build a new park. Yes, I've seen the rumors about a "thrill ride" park to compete with IOA. But when you factor in all of the infrastructure necessary to construct a park, the better approach would be to reinforce their current properties. The current contstruction plan to add an "E Ticket" to each of the 4 existing parks is an excellent move.
I've seen many people report that they either skip AK or MGM altogether, or only spend a portion of their day at each because they aren't "full day parks." IMO, that is an issue that WDW needs to address before they break ground on a new park. A new park only means that the existing properties get short-changed. Wrong move. Rather than building a new park with 8-10 attractions of its own, I'd rather see 2-3 new additions to the existing parks.
http://www.wdwmagic.com/newpark.htm
Not much information there. But what is of interest is the piece that begins "With Disney's Animal Kingdom having just opened..." There is no date on the page, but the comment about DAK would have to put the timeframe of its posting somewhere in mid-1998. The Disney Villains concept is mentioned as one of four possibilities. So, rumors of the concept date back more than five years.
Physical construction on DAK took just about 3 years. So, unless there is an announcement forthcoming in the next few days, a new park will not be a reality before 2007.
Personally, I fail to see much incentive for them to build a new park. Yes, I've seen the rumors about a "thrill ride" park to compete with IOA. But when you factor in all of the infrastructure necessary to construct a park, the better approach would be to reinforce their current properties. The current contstruction plan to add an "E Ticket" to each of the 4 existing parks is an excellent move.
I've seen many people report that they either skip AK or MGM altogether, or only spend a portion of their day at each because they aren't "full day parks." IMO, that is an issue that WDW needs to address before they break ground on a new park. A new park only means that the existing properties get short-changed. Wrong move. Rather than building a new park with 8-10 attractions of its own, I'd rather see 2-3 new additions to the existing parks.
, I wondered how that could be. I HATE the buses. They were never meant to be a permanent solution, but that's what they have become.