I suspect the people most likely to do this would be young adults. Late teens, early twenties. I haven't taken a survey, just guessing.Actually Disney did not announce this. The rumour mill states that employees leaked this to the media in an attempt to get media and internet coverage. Their hope would be that flashers would start flashing which would cause a ruckus and descent folks would be screaming at Disney for the possibility that their precious offspring might see naughty picture. Also the moral police would be demanding for the censors to return so as to protect descent folks from obscene signs such as the bird and feminine anatomy sans clothing.I STILL don't get why they announced the cut-backs ... last thing I need to see is a pubescent Hoo-Hah in a pic next to my kids head. Seriously, we will have words.
I'm all for calling the real cops...maybe cops on the premises will have Disney filling those positions again?
It's ok that the Park no longer screens the photos for flashers- if I end up in a log with a naked stranger, I'll just call the *real* police
Even if people are transferred there is a lost of positions. Instead of hiring 25 new people as bus boys and janitors they are keeping them low level people at low level so that higher seniority people can move from the defunct office to other jobs. When Yamabuki closed there was loss of total jobs available. The chef and waitress go to other restaurants thus the bus boy does not become a waiter and the waiter cannot become a lead.
If the workers were being rotated then perhaps there will not be job losses, so that is good. There will be the possibility still though of improper photographs being shown next to little Timmy who is wearing his mouse ears. I know that I really would prefer not to see anything like that, in a G park. 
