I'd liike to get the reaction of members of this forum regarding the famous (infamous) "Falling Man" photograph of one of the people who jumped/fell from the World Trade Center.
This photo was run on September 12th in papers around the country and around the world and elicited lots of very strong emotion.
Because of the reaction, most newspapers and broadcast media have never run the photo again (even while video of the second plane was played over and over).
Many people felt that it was disrespectful of the person depicted in that photo because he was about to die and it was somehow and "invasion" of his privacy.
I can understand that reaction, but I feel that it is at least somewhat disingenuous. There was no such universal outcry about the video of the second plan crashing into the WTC - and that moment represents the nearly instantaneous death of tens or hundreds of people. I think that intellectually there is no difference between the two, but that emotionally, the ability to see a human form is much more jarring.
I'm not saying that anyone should be "forced" to see picture or that people should be expected to be look at the picture, but I think that it is not the media's responsibility to keep that image from us.
It may have been too soon in the first days or first couple of years for that photograph to be run multiple times, but I believe it should be part of the collective consciousness and remembrance of that day.
I'm in the group that says we dishonor those who died this way if we try to forget about this part of the horror of that day.
I'd like to know what you all think.
FYI if anyone is interested in seeing the photo, there is a copy in the Wikipedia article on this.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falling_man
There is also a link to an excellent article from Esqiure magazine that was written about 2 years after 9/11 regarding the photo and its legacy.
Ted
This photo was run on September 12th in papers around the country and around the world and elicited lots of very strong emotion.
Because of the reaction, most newspapers and broadcast media have never run the photo again (even while video of the second plane was played over and over).
Many people felt that it was disrespectful of the person depicted in that photo because he was about to die and it was somehow and "invasion" of his privacy.
I can understand that reaction, but I feel that it is at least somewhat disingenuous. There was no such universal outcry about the video of the second plan crashing into the WTC - and that moment represents the nearly instantaneous death of tens or hundreds of people. I think that intellectually there is no difference between the two, but that emotionally, the ability to see a human form is much more jarring.
I'm not saying that anyone should be "forced" to see picture or that people should be expected to be look at the picture, but I think that it is not the media's responsibility to keep that image from us.
It may have been too soon in the first days or first couple of years for that photograph to be run multiple times, but I believe it should be part of the collective consciousness and remembrance of that day.
I'm in the group that says we dishonor those who died this way if we try to forget about this part of the horror of that day.
I'd like to know what you all think.
FYI if anyone is interested in seeing the photo, there is a copy in the Wikipedia article on this.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falling_man
There is also a link to an excellent article from Esqiure magazine that was written about 2 years after 9/11 regarding the photo and its legacy.
Ted