HWY20RIDE4MYSON Mouseketeer Joined May 20, 2012 Messages 323 Jun 13, 2014 #1 You'd think as much $$$ as they tied up in it. They would have put more leg room!!! SMH
Robo 1971 Castle in the Hub: Your lights are on! Joined Nov 18, 2001 Messages 106,995 Jun 14, 2014 #2 HWY20RIDE4MYSON said: You'd think as much $$$ as they tied up in it. They would have put more leg room!!! SMH Click to expand... The cars are too small, in-genearal. This is one of the biggest disappointments in basic attraction design.
HWY20RIDE4MYSON said: You'd think as much $$$ as they tied up in it. They would have put more leg room!!! SMH Click to expand... The cars are too small, in-genearal. This is one of the biggest disappointments in basic attraction design.
HWY20RIDE4MYSON Mouseketeer Joined May 20, 2012 Messages 323 Jun 15, 2014 #3 Yes this ride happends to be the worst for lwg room you'd think they would do better on that!!
JACKNAG DIS Veteran Joined Jan 22, 2003 Messages 725 Jun 15, 2014 #4 Does any one think they gave up on leg room to keep the height requirement down for little kids? This will hurt anyone one 6 feet definitely
Does any one think they gave up on leg room to keep the height requirement down for little kids? This will hurt anyone one 6 feet definitely
D dawgrif Mouseketeer Joined Aug 6, 2009 Messages 109 Jun 15, 2014 #5 I'm a big guy, 6'2" and about 275 and I had no issues. It was a little tight but not that bad.
HWY20RIDE4MYSON Mouseketeer Joined May 20, 2012 Messages 323 Jun 17, 2014 #6 Anyone with knee problems will have difficulty with this ride
tebookie WDW FAN Joined May 1, 2001 Messages 542 Jun 17, 2014 #7 Not "Pooh" size friendly either. Should have used the design used in Everest and customized it to 7 Dwarfs ride.
Not "Pooh" size friendly either. Should have used the design used in Everest and customized it to 7 Dwarfs ride.