You expect disagreement, but...

[Arabella Figg 2003]

Legal scholars asked to assess the recently released Justice Department memorandums concerning torture all but unanimously agreed that the quality of the legal work in them is poor.

It is unsurprising that law professors, who are generally liberal, should differ with the conclusions reached in the memos, which take a broad view of presidential power. But their attack on the professional quality of the memos was unusually sharp.

NY times

how can you discuss presidential powers without talking aobut the leading Supreme court case on point? if you're going to draft a document citing legal support for your proposition, at least get it right...