I reviewed the add and though it's not terribly well written, I don't think it's especially misleading either.
Sometimes I think it would be better for some people if they would live by the old posting rules of FidoNet -- that great networking system of years gone by:
1. Don't be overly annoying.
2. Don't be easily annoyed
Well said.The only thing relatively misleading is, "This is not the lodge but the brand new resort built with all the amenities you could want and having animals roam around oudoors for your viewing."
The implication appears to be that you would be able to view the animals from your room, but the only animals you would view from a standard view room would be the valet people.
The person states that "if available" a person could try to upgrade to a savanah view room for an extra $1,000.
I think that's a bit misleading only because if a person really wanted to view the animals from a savanah view room, I doubt if one would be available by the time the ebay listing resolves.
But, aside from that, I agree with you that this listing is not really a "biggee" kind of issue.
Sometimes I think it would be better for some people if they would live by the old posting rules of FidoNet -- that great networking system of years gone by:
1. Don't be overly annoying.
2. Don't be easily annoyed.
I think sometimes we just jump a little too far too fast, eh?
Anyway, that's my two-cents addition, for what it's worth . . .
Also well said Diane.Okay this might be an uncalled for comment but here goes. This thread and the one about being upset that CRO is upgrading folks from the values to DVC strike me as some of us sticking our noses where they don't belong. Clearly there are going to be things that annoy folks, but that doesn't mean what was done is wrong or even any of our business. We all need to be a little less snobish and a little more tolerant of things that annoy us.
This one's a gem. His latest reply:
Thats ok I have an email from my sales person at Disney 10 steps ahead of you.
The listing will be on and it will sell and I will be more then happy to shove it in your face
thanks for your time
Exactly.It says "it is not the Lodge but a brand new resort".
It IS the Lodge. It is the main building. It may be villas in the main building, but it does make it sound like it is a completely different resort - and it isn't yet.
Would this add really confuse you? Would you truly not know what your getting if you rented this?
That was exactly the point. Yes, I think someone not familiar with AKV WOULD have been confused/mislead by the original wording. I wouldn't have reported it if I didn't believe that.
Wow, those prices are koo-koo.
I've got a reservation at VWL over Christmas. I should ebay it for a bajillion dollars, too!
It looks like it'd still be cheaper than a 2 bedroom rental through DRC (for other 2 bedroom units during the holiday time). I don't have a problem as much with the price if someone wants to pay it.
I saw that, too, but he didn't really claim they were right outside the room for viewing. There ARE many public locations at the lodge where you can view the animals so technically, the seller is correct. I wouldn't word it that way for a standard view room, either.This is exactly why I don't use e-bay for anything. It's a standard view and there are "animals outside for viewing." If I made the implication that the animals would be in my room view, I will be sorely disappointed when I arrive.
After all, I was promised "all of the amenities you could want."
Bobbi