wenrob
DIS Legend
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2008
- Messages
- 10,566
I definitely agree it’s wrong and hurtful to not include her in any way.I guess I don't think it needs to be a tit for tat thing, but in this case of all the children and children's spouses of both the bride and groom, the OP is the only one excluded. That just seems kind of wrong to me.
But yeah, we don't know bride and OP's relationship, and it seems that OP's father was not interested in doing something non-traditional and having female groomspeople.
), maybe it was difficult for you when your dad moved on? Many women would find that a little threatening and especially if they're not-the-greatest-people (hey, it happens) to start with, she may have some resentment towards you?
Personally, if anyone is to "blame" here I think it's her own father. He should have seen to it she was included and the idea of including the SIL and not her is ridiculous IMO. Unfortunately, practically all of us have seen/experienced instances where a man will fail to advocate for his children when there is conflict with his new love interest.
That doesn't mean it would have been the right thing to do. Her Dad & DH absolutely should be standing up for her. I just don't agree with questioning the OP for being so close to her Mom that she's possibly created a strained relationship with her future stepmom. Considering that as the reason for the slight doesn't make sense to me. If that were the case, excluding her would make her even less inclined to want to have a relationship with her stepmom. How could any reasonable thinking father & stepmom think that's the way to deal with the situation? Unfortunately, I see a tough road ahead for the OP. It appears her new stepmom doesn't care, if they have a good relationship & Dad is going to go along with her.
