ZephyrHawk
Confirmed Disneyphile
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2007
- Messages
- 6,510
I voted yes. They are already doing it, them being alone together on vacation is not going to make them any more likely to get pregnant than they already are.
At 17, I still lived with my parents. But, DF worked crazy shift and DM was going out a lot. So even before 16, I was on my own sort of speak. I didn't have a curfew. At 16, I was going on road trips. However, I didn't get pregnant, I was little more responsible then that. Unlike 2 of my friends whose parents thought they had such a "strong hold" on them.
DD is 12 now, very mature. By 17 honestly, parents should have instilled values, discussed birth control,etc. And 1 year away from adulthood, given them wings and some freedom.
It's funny: people say no, but I dont think all the people who said no were that innocent at 17 themselves and I am sure it is scary to think of kids growing up, but it is a little hypocritical.
I think there's a pretty big difference between knowing/guessing your child is having sex and condoning it. Letting your child go away with a partner unchaparoned is obviously condoning his/her actions..
Some of the discussion this morning begs the question: How many folks made it through your teen years assuring your parents you weren't actually sneaking unchaperoned private time with our BF/GF (even though you were)?
If you're trying to apply that logic to the issue of this thread, though, it leads you to the inescapable conclusion that you cannot allow your child to go away to college (stay in the dorms).See and that is the other thing, I don't consider anyone an adult unless they are fully supporting themselves and that can be at 16 or 56 for that matter. Yes, I know in the eyes of the law they are legally but they sure are not emotionally until the do take full responsibility for everything in their life.
Me letting them go away unsupervised is the same as me handing them the key to the bedroom and telling them I think it's okay to have sex, and for us, it's not okay for them to have sex until they're married.
I would be shocked if my kids were virgins on their wedding nights. Sexual urges come with puberty - it's biological. Considering kids go through puberty in their early teens, I don't expect them to wait until marriage (because I would be devastated if my children got married in their early 20's). I do hope they wait until they are adults, though.
It is likely that your parents said the same thing about 17 year olds, when you were 17.I think 17 then and 17 now is at opposite ends of the spectrum. I have a 17 year old. When I compare us at the same age there is a drastic difference.
If you're trying to apply that logic to the issue of this thread, though, it leads you to the inescapable conclusion that you cannot allow your child to go away to college (stay in the dorms).
And especially not dorms with the suite-type arrangement, iykwim.
See and that is the other thing, I don't consider anyone an adult unless they are fully supporting themselves and that can be at 16 or 56 for that matter. Yes, I know in the eyes of the law they are legally but they sure are not emotionally until the do take full responsibility for everything in their life.
I know my answer is not going to be a popular one.
Am I so naive to think that all 4 of my kids will be virgins on their wedding nights? No. Do I hope so? Absolutely. Do we talk about waiting? All the time. Of course, we do also talk about birth control, that we hope they won't need until they're married.
Me letting them go away unsupervised is the same as me handing them the key to the bedroom and telling them I think it's okay to have sex, and for us, it's not okay for them to have sex until they're married.
It is likely that your parents said the same thing about 17 year olds, when you were 17.
Perhaps there has been some change: Due to how our society has changed, 17 year olds may be more mature now than thirty or forty years ago.