TipsyTraveler
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2014
- Messages
- 4,699
It is a 100% black and white decision, anything else is just rationalization. The issue is many people have no clue what that kitten, puppy or baby will really cost them over the years. They just make decisions and kick the consequence down the road until it seems like a grey decision. The moral card of the responsibility of the pet is just a rationalization of not being able to make the tough decision.
Would you say the same regarding medical expenses for your children, spouse, ailing parents? That it's a simple black and white financial decision? The "morality card" of your responsibilities to your loved ones is simply a rationalization of not being able to make tough decisions? "Sorry, Junior, getting you the medical treatment you need is going to be a poor financial choice for us, so the decision is easy."
Pets are not children anymore than dolls are children, there are people in debt and struggling because they spend a ton of money on things they don't need. Food and basic shelter are things that are actual needs that are reasonable things to go into emergency debt for as needed.
Nope, they sure aren't but, just like children, they are living beings who depend on you. When you make the decision to take on that responsibility you do everything in your power to see it through.
It's all about how you see things, and paying the monthly minimum on a huge debt is like deciding to only dig your way out of a sand pit with one hand because you don't want to let go of the shiny rock you saw that caused you to fall into it.
Exactly. As you see it, pets are disposable. As I see it, they are not. Everyone has different priorities. No matter what my financial situation, (I'm debt-free, for the record) I will move mountains to make sure I can give my pets proper care because they're one of my highest priorities. Perhaps people who don't have that level of commitment shouldn't get them in the first place.
.